On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:26 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some large ext4 filesystems with large numbers of files in them and
> performance really sucks. After inactivity, a simple ls takes minutes to
> complete. I'm pretty sure the drive is now powering itself down due to this
>
Please don't reply personally. Please reply to the list. You posted
your original question to the list, and for the sake of a possible few
others who are following this thread, it is good to keep all replies on
the list.
On 11/14/2014 11:48 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Thank you for y
On 11/12/2014 05:24 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got one suggestion that was mixed up with the response to another question
> regarding printers. The response suggested "man tune2fs". I had looked at
> this and looked again but saw NOTHING that seemed to relate to my question.
> Are th
Hi,
I got one suggestion that was mixed up with the response to another question
regarding printers. The response suggested "man tune2fs". I had looked at this
and looked again but saw NOTHING that seemed to relate to my question. Are
there any other suggestions please?
Regards,
George...
--
man tune2fs
suomi
On 11/11/2014 07:26 AM, George R Goffe wrote:
Hi,
I have some large ext4 filesystems with large numbers of files in them and
performance really sucks. After inactivity, a simple ls takes minutes to
complete. I'm pretty sure the drive is now powering itself down due to this
Hi,
I have some large ext4 filesystems with large numbers of files in them and
performance really sucks. After inactivity, a simple ls takes minutes to
complete. I'm pretty sure the drive is now powering itself down due to this
inactivity.
Are there tuning parameters that I could alter that w
