This is unbelievable! For I coundn't create usershare as i needed, I made a
share through smb.conf, that was "guest only" and "force user", and it worked.
And after I saw your message, I decided to try again and check all the
permissions and acls. I have created new usershare and it is working!
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Илья Коскин wrote:
> Hello everybody. Here is my problem. I have two computers, both with fedora
> workstation 27, both with selinux disabled, both fully updated. Both have the
> same configuration of samba:
> [global]
> usershare max shares = 5
>
unfortunately it did not helped :( only show me this:
open_directory: unable to create Новая папка/Новая папка. Error was
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
d'oh :(
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le..
i'm not just standing on one point, writing to lists, i already tried to create
new shares with another names, tried another directories, even tryed to create
not usershare, but smb.conf share:
[Shared]
path = /home/kasak/Shared
guest ok = yes
guest only = yes
writable = yes
so this is not a ty
On 13 February 2018 07:16:02 CET, Bill Shirley
wrote:
>List the [homes] section of testparm. You didn't answer my question
>about the missing
>path = statement.
>
I wouldn't expect to see a paths section For [homes] it would map to the home
directory of the unix user logging in to samba.
--
Jun
I use a path statement in my [homes] section:
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
path = /home/%u/windows
browseable = no
valid users = %S
writable = yes
guest ok = no
directory mask = 2770
create mask = 660
Just an FYI.
You created t
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 09:08 +, Илья Коскин wrote:
> path statement should not be specified in [homes] section, this is samba
> built in section, to
> dynamically share user home directories.
>
> I am not logged in as kasak, samba users is not the same as system users. To
> login as kasak,
Hello Fred. Of course i know about nfs and sshfs. I even know about dav,
included in gnome settings, but i have some another machines and it is more
comfortable to me, to use samba
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe s
path statement should not be specified in [homes] section, this is samba built
in section, to dynamically share user home directories.
I am not logged in as kasak, samba users is not the same as system users. To
login as kasak, first I need to add kasak to samba with smbpasswd -a kasak, or
sa
List the [homes] section of testparm. You didn't answer my question about the
missing
path = statement.
You logged in as kasak but the ownership of the created directory is
nobody:nobody. I
don't see how that could happen unless you're using a 'force user' and 'force
group'.
While still conn
if that was that simple, I would not write to this list.
I have already diff'ed the output of testparm -v and the only difference is
"hostname". I don't think that hostname is the problem. Here is magic:
[kasak@kasakoff ~]$ smbclient kasakoff\\Shared
Enter SAMBA\kasak's password:
Try "help"
Why is there no path = statement for [homes]?
Compare the output of 'testparm' from both machines.
After creating the 'foo' directory on both machines, compare the permissions of
the two directories 'ls -l'.
Bill
On 2/12/2018 1:16 PM, Илья Коскин wrote:
Hello everybody. Here is my problem. I
Given how open you have this set up I must ask if you have any windows
machines on this network that need to communicate with your two systems.
If not then some headache reduction may be found in using Linux native file
share such as nfs or sshfs. Just a thought.
-- Fred
_
Hello everybody. Here is my problem. I have two computers, both with fedora
workstation 27, both with selinux disabled, both fully updated. Both have the
same configuration of samba:
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
security = user
passdb backend = tdbsam
printing
14 matches
Mail list logo
