On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 06:35:24 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 27/12/2021 01:45, Beartooth wrote:
>> I'm OK, thanks! Just surprised.
>>
>> I'd love to help, but my .sig means what it says (and I'm ancient
>> of days).
>
> Well, according to the upstream website, the version you want was
>
On 27/12/2021 01:45, Beartooth wrote:
[...]
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:00:08 -0500, Ted Roche wrote:
You can look up packages at https://packages.fedoraproject.org/
and https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pan/pan/ shows you the
current state of things.
Perhaps you can get in touch with
[...]
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 16:00:08 -0500, Ted Roche wrote:
>
> You can look up packages at https://packages.fedoraproject.org/
>
> and https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pan/pan/ shows you the
> current state of things.
>
> Perhaps you can get in touch with the maintainers of the Fe
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 12:49 PM Beartooth wrote:
> Pan 0.149 is just out; but I get $ rpm -q pan
> pan-0.147-1.fc35.x86_64
> --
Beartooth:
You can look up packages at https://packages.fedoraproject.org/
and https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pan/pan/ shows you the
current state of
On 24/12/2021 01:48, Beartooth wrote:
Pan 0.149 is just out; but I get $ rpm -q pan
pan-0.147-1.fc35.x86_64
It may be "out", but certainly it hasn't been built for Fedora.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2724
--
Did 황준호 die?
__
Pan 0.149 is just out; but I get $ rpm -q pan
pan-0.147-1.fc35.x86_64
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
