On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 13:03 +0100, Lukas Middendorf wrote:
> On 06/02/2021 12:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Interestingly, Evince works (I hadn't tried it before). I assumed they
> > would both use the same back-end 'lpr' conversion process.
>
> I have the experience that Okular is better for
On 06/02/2021 12:51, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Interestingly, Evince works (I hadn't tried it before). I assumed they
would both use the same back-end 'lpr' conversion process.
I have the experience that Okular is better for display and evince is
better for printing. I often had problems prin
On Sat, 2021-02-06 at 18:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/02/2021 18:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > The PDF file at:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OeiRviDzunvZ1kVJjClwYCj6lyUNnCdv/view?usp=sharing
> >
> > opens correctly using Okular, but will only print as a blank page
> > (whe
On 06/02/2021 18:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
The PDF file at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OeiRviDzunvZ1kVJjClwYCj6lyUNnCdv/view?usp=sharing
opens correctly using Okular, but will only print as a blank page
(whether from Okular or just using 'lpr'). Any thoughts on why this is
happening?
The PDF file at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OeiRviDzunvZ1kVJjClwYCj6lyUNnCdv/view?usp=sharing
opens correctly using Okular, but will only print as a blank page
(whether from Okular or just using 'lpr'). Any thoughts on why this is
happening? No errors appear in the journal so I'm assuming i
