Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-19 Thread poma
On 19.01.2014 03:27, Garry T. Williams wrote: > On 1-17-14 21:03:39 poma wrote: >>> # setenforce 0 >>> # >>> # setenforce 1 >> >> I think I don't remember that I ever had to do it. >> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. > > The problem was caused by a bad SELinux policy that blocks rp

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-18 Thread Garry T. Williams
On 1-17-14 21:03:39 poma wrote: > > # setenforce 0 > > # > > # setenforce 1 > > I think I don't remember that I ever had to do it. > This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. The problem was caused by a bad SELinux policy that blocks rpm updates. You must set to permissive to get the corr

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
# yum reinstall x2go\* libXcomp\* libssh libNX\* nx\* No hay errores! :) poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-condu

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
On 17.01.2014 21:59, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0100, poma wrote: > >> On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote: >>> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. >>> >>> Not really. You might want to run >>

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:53:50 +0100, poma wrote: > On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote: > > > >> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. > > > > Not really. You might want to run > > > > semodule -B > > > > instead. > > # se

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
On 17.01.2014 21:34, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote: > >> This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. > > Not really. You might want to run > > semodule -B > > instead. # semodule -v -B Committing changes: Ok: transaction number 0. # yum --enabl

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 21:03:39 +0100, poma wrote: > This nullifies the very purpose of the SELinux. Not really. You might want to run semodule -B instead. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
On 17.01.2014 20:44, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:39:00PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote: On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: >

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:39:00PM +0100, poma wrote: > On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote: > >> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: > >>> > To X2Go or not to X2Go!? > >

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
On 17.01.2014 20:18, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: >>> To X2Go or not to X2Go!? >>> Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a proble

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:14:52PM +0100, poma wrote: > On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: > > > >> To X2Go or not to X2Go!? > >> > >> > > Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I > > installed it fine a few

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
On 17.01.2014 20:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: > >> To X2Go or not to X2Go!? >> >> > Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I > installed it fine a few weeks ago. There have been several reports of > failed scriplets among

Re: Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:49 PM, poma wrote: > To X2Go or not to X2Go!? > > Not sure I can answer that but I don't think this is a problem in x2go, I installed it fine a few weeks ago. There have been several reports of failed scriplets among various packages. Richard -- users mailing list use

Ouch! X2Go needs a couch!

2014-01-17 Thread poma
# yum install x2go\* … Running transaction Installing : nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc20.i686 1/47 warning: %post(nx-libs-3.5.0.21-3.fc20.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package nx-libs-3