On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 14:25 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> if you hadn't heard of OpenFoam, you had the option of ignoring the
> post, or doing a quick check to find out what it was about (as I said,
> it took me three seconds) - what's the point of a long thread
> castigating the OP???
It's general
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 08:23 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>> I have scotch building from a source RPM with minimal rpmlint output
>> (at least what I can personally fix).
>
> You're making open source booze? ;-)
Why not? :)
I didn't name it :) I'm n
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 08:23 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I have scotch building from a source RPM with minimal rpmlint output
> (at least what I can personally fix).
You're making open source booze? ;-)
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to
On 12/23/2011 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You seem to have missed the point of the complaint
you seem to miss the point of my complaint, which is about your
incessant, pedantic, self-centered, nanny-routine
now I'm feeding you. I've said my piece - you may have the last word
--
Claud
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 14:25 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
> if you hadn't heard of OpenFoam, you had the
> option of ignoring the post, or doing a quick check to find out what
> it was about (as I said, it took me three seconds)
You seem to have missed the point of the complaint, which is that
annou
On 12/23/2011 1:28 PM, Thomas Cameron wrote:
The OP really should have included that description.
agreed, but, his omission wasn't deserving of all the claptrap it got; I
try to stay out of the noise on the list, but, of late, it's become like
summer mosquitoes in Canada's forests around here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/23/2011 09:35 AM, Claude Jones wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 10:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> You still don't get it do you? The fact that some random package
>> was discussed a while back is no reason not to include a
>> one-line description rem
On 12/22/2011 10:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You still don't get it do you? The fact that some random package was
discussed a while back is no reason not to include a one-line
description reminding people what it is. It's not like we're talking
about gcc or X or the kernel. It's a niche int
> never heard of Google??
Long before Google came manners. You might like to look those up on
google too
> as already explained, thread was already open: I will not spend any more
> time (that I don't have) to add any single line why I didn't (or I forgot to)
> add the description of Openfoam..
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpii38
On 12/22/2011 11:47 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> as already explained, thread was already open: I will not spend any more
> time (that I don't have) to add any single line why I didn't (or I forgot to)
> add the description of Openfoam...
You are totally incorrect
If your "annou
On 12/22/2011 08:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:32 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
never heard of Google??
Unbelievable. Do you *still* not get it? In words of one syllable: why
do you make me look at a web page to see if I want this? Why do you not
just t
On 12/22/2011 07:39 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Make the effort to explain yourself just a little bit. Not all of us
are rocket scientists.
Not only that, not all of us share your interests. Just because this
project is very important to you doesn't mean that world+dog is going to
recognize it wi
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:47 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> as already explained, thread was already open
Wrong. There is a discussion about two month ago. Your new message is
not part of that thread and makes no reference to it.
I'm done discussing this.
poc
--
users mailing list
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 16:32 +0100, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> never heard of Google??
Unbelievable. Do you *still* not get it? In words of one syllable: why
do you make me look at a web page to see if I want this? Why do you not
just tell the list in the first place?
poc
--
users mail
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> >> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >>
> >> On the download page http
>Messaggio originale
>Da: ed.gres...@greshko.com
>Data: 22-dic-2011
16.39
>A: "Community support for Fedora users"
>Ogg: Re: R: Re: Openfoam is
available!!!
>
>On 12/22/2011 11:32 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
>>
never heard of Google?
On 12/22/2011 11:32 PM, antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
> never heard of Google??
I am sure he has heard of Google...and so have I.
But, the point is don't make people search to determine what you are
talking about in order to see if they are interested to know more.
Make the effort to explai
>Messaggio originale
>Da: pocallag...@gmail.com
>Data: 22-dic-2011
16.22
>A:
>Ogg: Re: Openfoam is available!!!
>
>On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47
+0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
>> > On Thu, 2011-
12-22 at 09:27
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:47 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> 2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> >> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >>
> >> On the download page http://www.open
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 15:12 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So if you don't already know what openfoam is, you definitely don't
> need it,
> and you are safe to just ignore the threads about it. :-)
>
Thanks for the explanation, but a single line from the OP saying
"Computational fluid dynamics p
On Thursday 22 December 2011 10:09:16 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> > Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
> >
> > On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
>
2011/12/22 Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>>
>> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
>> think that the instruction module lo
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpii38
On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 09:27 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
>
> On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
> think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
> module load openmpi
Openfoam is available for F15 and F16, both 32 bit and 64 bit.
On the download page http://www.openfoam.com/download/fedora.php I
think that the instruction module load openmpi-x86_64 should be read
module load openmpii386 in case of 32 bit.
Shall it be included in the official repos
26 matches
Mail list logo
