On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:29 PM, maderios wrote:
>> On 12/25/2015 10:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, maderios wrote:
'Secure boot' is just a windows problem. In Linux world, nobody uses
>>
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:29 PM, maderios wrote:
> On 12/25/2015 10:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, maderios wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 'Secure boot' is just a windows problem. In Linux world, nobody uses
>>> 'Secure
>>> Boot'. In Windows world, they need it and they u
On 12/25/2015 01:29 PM, maderios wrote:
Its' Redhat point of view...
I'm not specialist but, historically, I know Redhat dev asked Linus
Torvalds patch kernel with 'secure boot'
It's an interesting historical footnote, but I don't think you (or the
authors of those articles) understand the
On 12/25/2015 10:00 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:50 PM, maderios wrote:
'Secure boot' is just a windows problem. In Linux world, nobody uses 'Secure
Boot'. In Windows world, they need it and they use it because Windows system
is 'natively' insecured.
Nonsense. Secure
