On Sun, 2010-04-18 at 17:11 +, hewjr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Where do I go to get 3D drivers for Nvidia 6550 card
Running f12 on an HP DV6T
1 Gig Ram
250 Gig HD
Also how to install
Thanks
rpmfusion.org. Instruc
Where do I go to get 3D drivers for Nvidia 6550 card
Running f12 on an HP DV6T
1 Gig Ram
250 Gig HD
Also how to install
Thanks
-Inline Attachment Follows-
You may get the the drivers from nvidia site, but the recommended way to get
thim is through rpmfusion:
http://rpmfusion.org/Ho
Where do I go to get 3D drivers for Nvidia 6550 card
Running f12 on an HP DV6T
1 Gig Ram
250 Gig HD
Also how to install
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
Gary,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:15 PM, gary artim wrote:
> Don --
>
> That would be great, please report back. I have clients using borken
> system with ati hd 4770 cards. Have a
> bug started but not much action so far. Considering swapping in Nvidia
> cards so they can at least see there
> work
Don --
That would be great, please report back. I have clients using borken
system with ati hd 4770 cards. Have a
bug started but not much action so far. Considering swapping in Nvidia
cards so they can at least see there
work cleanly.
-- Gary
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Don Quixote de la M
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Those drivers are unlikely to work on F11. I tried rebuilding the F12 mesa
> SRPM for F11 in a Koji scratch build, it didn't even build. It'll be much
> easier to just upgrade to F12.
For now, I'm just going to do a plain kernel build from Da
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> Someone has pointed out to me where I need to go to download and build
> the source that might enable 3D accelleration on my ($$$) ATI Radeon
> 4870HD card. I plan to give that a try next.
Those drivers are unlikely to work on F11. I tried rebuilding the F12 mesa
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:46:36 -0800,
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
>
> Someone has pointed out to me where I need to go to download and build
> the source that might enable 3D accelleration on my ($$$) ATI Radeon
> 4870HD card. I plan to give that a try next.
If you are using F12 you sho
Seeing as how glxgears isn't a good benchark, and that Extreme Tux
Racer won't even run on my box, I installed the Phoronix Test Suite,
then told it to install the idquake3-games benchmark suite.
A suite in Phoronix is a set of related benchmark tests. One can
perform individual benchmarks, or al
gary artim wrote:
> hey, so the mesa-dri-drivers-experimental needed in addition to the
> radeon driver?
If you want 3D acceleration on the Radeon HD (up to 4xxx) cards, yes.
> could this help with garbled screens I get from the radeon driver or kde?
Probably not. That's probably a bug in the 2D
On Thursday 11 February 2010 10:08 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 February 2010 06:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family
>>> of
>>> cards. and tha
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010 06:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family of
>> cards. and that is probably the reason why tuxracer doesn't work. However, I
>> don't know why glx
On Thursday 11 February 2010 06:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family of
> cards. and that is probably the reason why tuxracer doesn't work. However, I
> don't know why glxinfo reports that direct rendering is active in this case.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> AFAIK, the radeon driver doesn't support 3D acceleration for HD4*** family of
> cards. and that is probably the reason why tuxracer doesn't work. However, I
> don't know why glxinfo reports that direct rendering is active in this case.
Ah,
On Friday 12 February 2010 01:04:37 Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> This is very odd: on my F11 box at home, with the Radeon card...
>
> > You can check for direct rendering like this:
> >
> > glxinfo | grep direct
> >
> > If it says "yes", then all should be well. :-)
>
> Indeed it says yes, a
This is very odd: on my F11 box at home, with the Radeon card...
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Is 3D actually turned on? You can have both hardware and drivers which support
> 3D, but have xorg.conf that disables it, or something like that. You can check
> for direct r
On Thursday 11 February 2010 14:21:51 Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Ah that is why my work box has such a high framerate - the
> closed-source nVidia driver can use undocumented features that have
> not yet been reversed-engineered for
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
>> How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11?
>
> The "radeonhd" driver is not really supported in Fedora (some volunteer is
> packaging it as an alternative, but it's not the recomme
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11?
The "radeonhd" driver is not really supported in Fedora (some volunteer is
packaging it as an alternative, but it's not the recommended driver), you
should use the default "radeon" driver, or
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> The idea of 2D and 3D acceleration is to take the load off the processor. So
> you should not expect the performance of accelerated graphics to depend on the
> CPU model. Not too much, anyway.
That depends on the application. Some 3D "acc
On Thursday 11 February 2010 12:38:38 Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11?
>
> My box at work and my box at home are both Core 2 Quad Xeons.
The idea of 2D and 3D acceleration is to take the load off the processor. So
you should
Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> However while the nVideo card at work can run glxgears at a frame rate
> of 5000 FPS, my Radeon can only do 300!
Note that glxgears has always been considered a bad speed test.
Better base your speed doubts on something else.
--
Roberto Ragusamail at robe
How well is radeonhd's 3D accelleration expected to work in Fedora 11?
I did a "yum update" recently.
My box at work and my box at home are both Core 2 Quad Xeons.
My work box runs Ubuntu 8.10 and has an nVidia card - lspci says:
nVidia Corporation Device 0658 (rev a1)
lsmod shows that it's
23 matches
Mail list logo
