Tim via users wrote:
>> If you remove the key and run dnf again, it should prompt
>> you to install the current key, which will (hopefully) work.
>>
>> In other words:
>>
>> $ sudo rpm -e gpg-pubkey-17280ddf
>
> I've encountered that kind of thing before, but why does it require
> manual int
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 7:08 PM Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> > I wrote:
> >> Max Pyziur wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Greetings,
> >>>
> >>> GPG Keys are configured as:
> https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/repodata/repomd.xml.key
> >
Todd Zullinger
> > Another possibility is that the keys have been updated since
> > you initially installed them and you need to remove the
> > current key to allow dnf to import the updated key.
Todd Zullinger:
> I think this is the case.
>
> I was able to copy the yum repo file from there and i
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I wrote:
Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
GPG Keys are configured as:
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/repodata/repomd.xml.key
Any guidance here would be appreciated.
[...]
Another possibility is that the key
e not correct for this package.
>> Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing
>> package is: nodejs-electron-30.3.0-2.13.x86_64
>> GPG Keys are configured as:
>> https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/repodata/rep
k that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing
> package is: nodejs-electron-30.3.0-2.13.x86_64
> GPG Keys are configured as:
> https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/repodata/repomd.xml.key
> Public key for signal-desktop-7.
repository..
Failing package is: nodejs-electron-30.3.0-2.13.x86_64
GPG Keys are configured as:
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_40/repodata/repomd.xml.key
Public key for signal-desktop-7.19.0-1.1.x86_64.rpm is not trusted.
Failing package is: signal-desktop-
followup to last query, since i have never *knowingly* done anything
with nodejs, i'm wondering how safe i am to try to wipe every trace of
it from my own fedora 27 system, then re-install.
first, it *appears* that from a package perspective, no other
*packages* appear to depend on n
All these packages are nodejs ones.
> Below is the error I get when trying to upgrade one package, nodejs:
>
> # dnf upgrade nodejs
> .
> Running transaction check
> Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transa
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:16 PM Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > I am upgrading my box to F25 from F24.
> >
> > First I ran # dnf upgrade --refresh , but some packages did not upgarde.
> All these packages are nodejs ones.
> &
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I am upgrading my box to F25 from F24.
First I ran # dnf upgrade --refresh , but some packages did not upgarde. All
these packages are nodejs ones.
Below is the error I get when trying to upgrade one package, nodejs:
# dnf upgrade nodejs
I am upgrading my box to F25 from F24.
First I ran # dnf upgrade --refresh , but some packages did not upgarde.
All these packages are nodejs ones.
Below is the error I get when trying to upgrade one package, nodejs:
# dnf upgrade nodejs
.
Running transaction check
On 03/04/2016 04:13 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2016 17:37:16 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> engine.io isn't packaged in Fedora, so it's not going to be able to find it
>> just from a yum install.
>>
>> You need to run `npm install` in "and it
>> will download all the requires
On Thursday 03 March 2016 17:37:16 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> engine.io isn't packaged in Fedora, so it's not going to be able to find it
> just from a yum install.
>
> You need to run `npm install` in "and it
> will download all the requires modules into the node_modules folder which
> then can
On 03/02/2016 09:54 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I folks.
>
> I've tried installing node.js and socket.io as I want to see if they will
> provide a solution to a problem I have.
>
> However, the first problem I've got is that it won't run. Below are the yum
> installs that I've tried. They look
1 gary gary 249 Mar 2 14:18 package.json
drwxrwxr-x 2 gary gary 4096 Mar 2 14:18 public
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gary gary 497 Mar 2 14:18 README.md
[gary@gary chat]$
yum install nodejs nodejs-ws
yum install nodejs-express.noarch nodejs-express-session.noarch \
nodejs-ansi-regex.noarch
yum install nod
I yum removed nodejs which removed all v8 s as well then yum installed
nodejs which installed Package v8.x86_64 1:3.14.5.10-1.fc19 Rails
requires nodejs which requires v8.
Huh? A `yum install rubygem-rails` does not drag in nodejs. I'm curious
as to what does; it probably should be
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Roger wrote:
> I yum removed nodejs which removed all v8 s as well
> then yum installed nodejs which installed Package v8.x86_64
> 1:3.14.5.10-1.fc19
>
> Rails requires nodejs which requires v8.
Huh? A `yum install rubygem-rails` does not drag
I yum removed nodejs which removed all v8 s as well
then yum installed nodejs which installed Package v8.x86_64
1:3.14.5.10-1.fc19
Rails requires nodejs which requires v8.
v8 is buggy and will not update with sudo yum update
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Pack
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:59 +, Scott van Looy wrote:
> Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS
> yet?
> I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
> Is it likely that this will be in the next release of Fedora, does
> an
On 24/02/11 16:19, Scott van Looy wrote:
> Today Frank Murphy did spake thusly:
>
>> On 24/02/11 15:59, Scott van Looy wrote:
>>> Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet?
>>> I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Today Frank Murphy did spake thusly:
> On 24/02/11 15:59, Scott van Looy wrote:
>> Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet?
>> I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
>> Is it likely that this will be in the next
On 24/02/11 15:59, Scott van Looy wrote:
> Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet?
> I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
> Is it likely that this will be in the next release of Fedora, does anyone
> know?
>
> Scot
Hello - I'm looking in Rawhide and can't find any reference to NodeJS yet?
I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911
Is it likely that this will be in the next release of Fedora, does anyone
know?
Scott
--
Scott van Looy - email:m...@ethosuk.org.uk | web:www.etho
24 matches
Mail list logo
