On 06/24/15 05:58, jd1008 wrote:
> I kinda guessed that, but I still wonder if NM is going to work
> differently to what people have been used to and could cause
> problems in configurations and scripts if the behavioral changes
> become engraved in future releases of NM.
NetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.
On 06/23/2015 03:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/24/15 04:59, jd1008 wrote:
On 06/23/2015 02:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am still investigating this, but I
On 06/24/15 04:59, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/23/2015 02:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
>> jd1008 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop
On 06/23/2015 02:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is
only getting an IP6 address set up on the loopbac
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 11:44:50 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is
> >> only getting an IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I
> >> noticed t
On 06/21/2015 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is only getting an
IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I noticed this because I run a
local resolver on 127.0.0.1 and connections to it s
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 09:42:31 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm seeing this also with the similar rawhide version:
NetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.git20150618.8cffaf3bf5.fc23
I couldn't find an existing bug, so I filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234478
Thanks. I didn't see this o
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:34:15 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:50:54 +0800,
> Ed Greshko wrote:
> >FWIW, also have a laptop running F22 and fully updated. Currently
> >at NetworkManager-1.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64 which I believe is the latest
> >and I'm not having any diffic
On 06/22/15 13:34, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:50:54 +0800,
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> FWIW, also have a laptop running F22 and fully updated. Currently at
>> NetworkManager-1.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64 which I believe is the latest and I'm not
>> having any difficulties with my lo
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:50:54 +0800,
Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, also have a laptop running F22 and fully updated. Currently at
NetworkManager-1.0.2-1.fc22.x86_64 which I believe is the latest and I'm not
having any difficulties with my lo interface.
I'm running NetworkManager-1.0.4-0.1.gi
On 06/22/15 12:31, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is only getting
> an IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I noticed this because I run
> a local resolver on 127.0.0.1 and connections to it stopped working over
> night (after a reb
I am still investigating this, but I have an f22 laptop that is only
getting an IP6 address set up on the loopback interface. I noticed this
because I run a local resolver on 127.0.0.1 and connections to it stopped
working over night (after a reboot). The was a NetworkManager update before
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
