Tom Horsley writes:
> Everyone tries to convince me that the default audio device gets
> saved/memorized. I remain stubbornly unconvinced.
I wonder if it is an audio device that takes a long time to initialize
and the "restore audio" logic says "I can't find that, I'll use the default,
that mus
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:49:52 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Consider yourself lucky that you have to do it only on a new install. My
> default audio device is broken after every reboot, and I have to reset it
> every time.
I sometimes have to do it again after some (but not all
Tom Horsley writes:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:08:09 -0700
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I would
> greatly appreciate some guidance.
May not be relevant, but I've noticed on a new install, the default
sound device is always the device I have nothing connected to. I
always have to run the so
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 21:20:38 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:08:09 -0700
> Geoffrey Leach wrote:
>
> > I would
> > greatly appreciate some guidance.
>
> May not be relevant, but I've noticed on a new install, the default
> sound device
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:08:09 -0700
Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> I would
> greatly appreciate some guidance.
May not be relevant, but I've noticed on a new install, the default
sound device is always the device I have nothing connected to. I
always have to run the sound control center app
After installing Fedora 35 on a previously-working F32 (pulseaudio),
there is no sound.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F35_bugs#No_sound_after_upgrade_.28wireplumber_not_running.29
provided some suggestions, which did not work. In desperation, I erased
pipewire and wireplumber and installed
On 7/22/20 5:58 PM, Jack Craig wrote:
what is the current wisdom on debugging this fedora 32 freeze failure type?
You'll first need to provide some information.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to u
what is the current wisdom on debugging this fedora 32 freeze failure type?
thx, jackc...
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.f
On 6/21/19 12:33 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Is it an issue with the stick, or it is because I have not been able to
configure properly the bios to boot on an external USB stick (efi?) ?
Check in the BIOS to make sure there is a USB option in the EFI boot
list. You can also try to disable legacy
)380395988
===
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 at 7:58 PM
> From: "Gordon Messmer"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: New install
>
> On 6/21/19 5:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> &g
On 6/21/19 5:35 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
But I get the following message:
Your bios-based system needs a special partition to boot from a GPT disk label.
To continue please create a 1Mb /biosboot type
There is already a fedora installed on sdb
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Numb
Hello,
On a system with 2 HD,
1 SSH (sdb) and 1 standard HD (sda) of 2 TBit
I wanted to make a fresh (and basic) installation on sda
I created a 15 GB ext4 partition for that purpose.
Using the installer (from a USB stick).
I selected my partition (sda6) for the system (/)
But I get the following
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:25 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I cannot swap the cables, one is a Sata (3.5) and the other one
> is a SSH on the mother board.
>
I like seeing my drives in a certain order to satisfy my OCD but it doesn't
really matter...
Thanks,
Richard
I cannot swap the cables, one is a Sata (3.5) and the other one
is a SSH on the mother board.
>
> Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2019, Patrick Dupre sent:
> > I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> > The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> > I could not change from the BIOS th
Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2019, Patrick Dupre sent:
> I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> I could not change from the BIOS the order.
For future reference: If they both use the same interface type, such
as SATA, then you probabl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:09 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The issue is solved.
> Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not
> compatible with a UEFI
> boot.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance.
>
It's not intuitive! But that was going to be my next question, glad you
figured it o
The issue is solved.
Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not compatible with a UEFI
boot.
Sorry for the disturbance.___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists
"Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector
20, 2019 at 2:27 PM
From: "Richard Shaw"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model:
ity support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector size (log
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 12:41 PM Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> Thank for the feedback,
>
> May I shuld have say something.
> When I got the SSD, there was a Ubuntu install taht I destroyed, but I kept
> the 2 first
> partitions:
> Device StartEnd Sectors Size Type
> /dev/sdb1
20, 2019 at 8:20 PM
From: "Richard Shaw"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
Subject: Re: New install
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:08 AM Patrick Dupre <pdu...@gmx.com> wrote:
Hello,
I need help!
I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
The ssd shows up in sdb, with
I was temporarily not able to ssh into my home machine, but here's some
examples of what you should see for a UEFI install:
$ sudo parted -l
...
Model: NVMe Device (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 500GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Si
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:08 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need help!
> I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
> The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
> I could not change from the BIOS the order.
> The machine is UEFI, then I guess that it does not really matter.
>
No,
Hello,
I need help!
I got a machine with 1 ssd and on HD.
The ssd shows up in sdb, with the HD shows up in sda.
I could not change from the BIOS the order.
The machine is UEFI, then I guess that it does not really matter.
I want to boot on the ssd
I installed fedora from the lice cd on the ssd. bu
On 13/2/19 7:59 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/12/19 1:28 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have installed Windows 10 on my raid system as that was the
only OS the new motherboard provided raid drivers for at install
time. The install of Windows 10 was done in UEFI mode (albeit there
doesn't appea
On 2/12/19 1:28 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I have installed Windows 10 on my raid system as that was the only
OS the new motherboard provided raid drivers for at install time. The
install of Windows 10 was done in UEFI mode (albeit there doesn't appear
to be a UEFI partition on the ssd wind
Hi,
I have installed Windows 10 on my raid system as that was the only
OS the new motherboard provided raid drivers for at install time. The
install of Windows 10 was done in UEFI mode (albeit there doesn't appear
to be a UEFI partition on the ssd windows is installed to, there is only
th
1. The installation enabled LUKS encryption at install time.
2. At every clean shutdown and reboot, the user enters the LUKS
password, and then fsck takes place - EVERY TIME!!!
Is this due to LUKS? If so, how can the user remove the LUKS feature?
4. After setting the firefox preferences, sin
On 22 Jun 2016 at 23:29, Saint Michael wrote:
From: Saint Michael
Date sent: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 23:29:11 -0400
Subject:Re: Question on best process to setup new install
To: Community support for Fedora users
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
>
> I ru
I run that command and the final output showed for duplicate names. I guess
that some packages have 32 bit counter parts.
How would you modify the command to transfer all the packages and their
architecture?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Michael D. Setzer II <
mi...@kuentos.guam.net> wrote:
>
On 22 Jun 2016 at 10:31, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Subject:Re: Question on best process to setup new install
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Samuel Sieb
Date sent: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:31:27 -0700
Send reply to
On 22 Jun 2016 at 9:27, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Subject:Re: Question on best process to setup new install
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Gordon Messmer
Date sent: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 09:27:38 -0700
Send reply
On 06/21/2016 11:05 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Question on setup machine after clean install?
This is the process I've been using.
rpm --qf "%{NAME}\n" -qa | sort | grep -v gpg-pubkey | grep -v kmod-V |
After putting copied files on new machine run
dnf install `cat installed_pkgs.txt`
Th
On 06/21/2016 11:05 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Any ways to improve this process?
Arguably: Start using ansible, or another configuration management tool
to install packages and make changes to the system. If you make a habit
of *only* making changes to the system using configuration ma
On 06/22/16 14:05, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> msttcorefonts-2.5-1.noarch is no longer available, but have a copy, so
> manually install it.
This has been replaced by msttcore-fonts-installer-2.6-1.noarch
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Question on setup machine after clean install?
This is the process I've been using.
rpm --qf "%{NAME}\n" -qa | sort | grep -v gpg-pubkey | grep -v kmod-V | grep
-v google-earth > installed_pkgs.txt
Copy all *.repo files from /etc/yum.repos.d
Copy files from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
After putting copi
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:55 AM, fedora wrote:
> dmesg
> journalctl
> /var/log/boot.log
> /var/log/messages
> ...
>
> suomi
>
>
> On 2015-10-29 22:59, JD wrote:
>
>> During boot, I get (as a last line) something like
>> Not Authorized and I do not get the GUI coming up.
>> I get the prompt to en
dmesg
journalctl
/var/log/boot.log
/var/log/messages
...
suomi
On 2015-10-29 22:59, JD wrote:
During boot, I get (as a last line) something like
Not Authorized and I do not get the GUI coming up.
I get the prompt to enter control-D or enter the root
password.
How can one debug this to find th
During boot, I get (as a last line) something like
Not Authorized and I do not get the GUI coming up.
I get the prompt to enter control-D or enter the root
password.
How can one debug this to find the root cause?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:05:47 +1030
Leo Simmonds wrote:
> I used LiveUSB, I've now tried the Unetbootin and that doesnt work
> either, as comes up with a different error, saying BOOTMGR is
> missing...
>
use dd /iso to /usb/disk method.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_U
I used LiveUSB, I've now tried the Unetbootin and that doesnt work either, as
comes up with a different error, saying BOOTMGR is missing...
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: eoconno...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New Install
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:42:19 -0500
Maybe try downloadin
Maybe try downloading the F20 installer again?...did you use Unetbootin to
get the files on the USB?
- Reply message -
From: "Leo Simmonds"
To: "users@lists.fedoraproject.org"
Subject: New Install
Date: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 11:10 am
Hi, I have v20 on a U
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 02:40:05 +1030
Leo Simmonds wrote:
Can't mount root filesystem" What now?
>
https://www.happyassassin.net/2014/02/04/more-on-booting-a-practical-fedora-uefi-guide-and-dont-use-universal-usb-stick-writers/
___
Regards
Frank
frankly3d.
Hi, I have v20 on a USB drive and want to install on a new machine with no OS
currently in place.
When I boot, the Fedora install page comes up but then goes into "Starting
Dracut Emergency Shell" after the "Warning: Can't mount root filesystem"
What now?
On 01/02/2014 02:50 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> 1. I copied all my virtual machine config files from
> the old /etc/libvirt/qemu to the new /etc/libvirt/qemu,
> then did a "systemctl restart libvirtd.service" and
> the gnome 3 shell immediately stopped talking, waited
> a few minutes, then died with "
I can't reproduce any of these, but I thought I'd go ahead
and report them just in case they can be correlated with
other reports:
1. I copied all my virtual machine config files from
the old /etc/libvirt/qemu to the new /etc/libvirt/qemu,
then did a "systemctl restart libvirtd.service" and
the gn
On 10/23/2013 06:44 PM, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 new install.
Fedora didn't setup Windows Vista in boot Menu.
How do I get windows in Boot Menu.
Windows is still on Hard Drive at sda1 .
Below is /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkc
Fedora 18 new install.
Fedora didn't setup Windows Vista in boot Menu.
How do I get windows in Boot Menu.
Windows is still on Hard Drive at sda1 .
Below is /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/g
On 11/19/2012 01:31 PM, Sergio wrote:
yumex is working just fine here. Don't mess with its desktop files, your issue
is something else.
BTW, that looks like yumex-local.desktop which is made to install local rpm's.
yumex.desktop is attached in case you lost it (?)
I don't have a desktop file f
--- Em seg, 19/11/12, Joe Zeff escreveu:
> De: Joe Zeff
> Assunto: [Solved] Re: Yumex issue on new install
> Para: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Data: Segunda-feira, 19 de Novembro de 2012, 19:02
> A correction to my last post: when I
> went to edit the
A correction to my last post: when I went to edit the menu to add
--update-only to the yumex command line, I saw this:
/usr/bin/yumex -X install %F
This means that, as installed, yumex is expecting to be given a program
to install on the command line. No wonder it doesn't work! Removing
tha
> Just to close things off, I've logged onto the laptop,
> removed myself from wheel and things are working the way I
> want. However, if I run it from the menu and there are
> no updates, it simply tells me there's nothing to do and
> exits.
I never saw it behave this way (close itself). Maybe
On 11/19/2012 03:41 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSEL
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSELF.
Just to close things off, I've logge
On 11/19/2012 11:38 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Did you select for you to be in the administartors group? If so you can
now do a lot of things previously restricted to root; one of them is
install software. But everytime you have to authenticate YOURSELF.
I kind of like this move.
OK, that's
On 11/19/2012 11:26 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
proving that it was a software issue not a kernel
On 11/19/2012 02:26 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
proving that it was a software issue not a kernel
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
> install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went away,
> proving that it was a software issue not a kernel issue. The bad news is
> that after install
I finally broke down and replaced F16 with F17 on my laptop with a clean
install, except for /home. The good news is that the boot issue went
away, proving that it was a software issue not a kernel issue. The bad
news is that after installing yumex I can't get it to run. It asks me
to authen
Everyone,
I am trying to do a new install of F16 on a HP Pavilion g series
notebook. This is an x64 install.
The first problem was related to booting the install x64 DVD. The
screen went blank after bit and the install died. I have tested the DVD
with checksums, and on a different computer
Everyone,
I am trying to do a new install of F16 on a HP Pavilion g series
notebook. This is an x64 install.
The first problem was related to booting the install x64 DVD. The
screen went blank after bit and the install died. I have tested the DVD
with checksums, and on a different computer
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> The minimum requirement is 512MB of RAM (see http://fedoraproject.org/).
> With 256MB I suspect there isn't enough space even for the root image
> (which lives in a RAM filesystem as the error message implies).
Unfortunately, that documentation is wrong. The
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
On 05/24/2011 08:04 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
If you go to http://fedoraproject.org/ the minimum requirements include
"at least 512 MB of memory." Sorry.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:04 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> List,
>
> I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
> 256 mgs of memory.
>
> I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
> difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome
List,
I have been trying to do a fresh install of F15 i386 on a Dell 8250 with
256 mgs of memory.
I am able to boot from the DVD as well as the netiso CD without
difficulty, but after picking the first option on the "Welcome to Fedora
15" screen to install a new system I am not been able to get p
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/23/2010 01:59 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
while the /etc/passwd seems OK
pdupre:x:500:500:Patrick:/home/pdupre:/bin/bash
id:
uid=500(pdupre) gid=500(pdupre) groups=500(pdupre)
context=unconfin
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
I just installed on a machine fedora13 and I do face a couple of
small problems. They may be related together.
The NetworkManager does not seem to be running while the service seems
running OK (enabled and running)
I have to do /et
On 10/23/2010 01:59 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
while the /etc/passwd seems OK
>> pdupre:x:500:500:Patrick:/home/pdupre:/bin/bash
>> id:
>> uid=500(pdupre) gid=500(pdupre) groups=500(pdupre)
>> context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed on a machine fedora13 and I do face a couple of
> small problems. They may be related together.
>
> The NetworkManager does not seem to be running while the service seems
> running OK (enabled and running)
> I have
Hello,
I just installed on a machine fedora13 and I do face a couple of
small problems. They may be related together.
The NetworkManager does not seem to be running while the service seems
running OK (enabled and running)
I have to do /etc/init.d/NetworkManager restart
and then to start the ne
On 10/12/2010 02:49 PM, jim wrote:
>Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
>
> I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>
> There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
>
> I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get i
On 10/12/2010 06:16 PM, JD wrote:
>On 10/12/2010 02:49 PM, jim wrote:
>> Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
>>
>> I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>>
>> There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
>>
>>
On 12 October 2010 22:49, jim wrote:
> Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
>
> I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>
> There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
>
> I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get i
On 10/12/2010 02:49 PM, jim wrote:
>Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
>
> I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
>
> There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
>
> I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get i
Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get it to show
after starting about:plugins in firefox .
I wonder if the
> > There is a process by which people can support other architectures. If
> > enough
> > people that care enough to do the actual work involved with maintaining
> > a secondary architecture work to make it happen, there could be an i586
> > and/or i486 secondary architecture.
> Well, what is invo
On 9/18/2010 2:08 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2010 10:39 AM, David Boles wrote:
>> On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> I would think that Fedora would be more than happy if you performed the
>> work and provided the server(s) and HD space.
>>
>> So when can we expect to see the fruits of your
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:05 PM, JB wrote:
>
> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
> testers as a result ? Starting with Fedora 14 ?
>
> Sometimes I think Fedora is getting ah
On 09/18/2010 10:39 AM, David Boles wrote:
> On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>>
>> On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>>> JB wrote:
>>> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources
>>> is a good reason.
>>
On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote:
>
>
> On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>>JB wrote:
>> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources
>> is a good reason.
>>
>> There is a process by which people can support
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:14:50 -0700,
JD wrote:
>
>
> Well, what is involved in building of Fedora for the i386 arch
> other than an automated script that sets the gcc options to
> compile for the i386 architecture?
> Is that really all that much work?
If you don't care that any of it work
On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
>JB wrote:
>> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
>> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
>> testers as a result ? Starti
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +,
JB wrote:
>
> I think Fedora excludes too many users and their machines for no good reason.
> Perhaps Fedora could change arch to i586 and have a bigger base of users and
> testers as a result ? Starting with Fedora 14 ?
Fedora doesn't have infinite reso
On 09/18/2010 09:05 AM, JB wrote:
snip a lot
> Wow ! Who could be behind it ? :-)
> Mr Sherlock Holmes to the rescue ...
>
> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora
snip some more ..
Well, Sherlock JB Holmes,
You gotta know that more often than not,
MONEY TALKS!!
--
users mailing
, September 18, 2010 11:05 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: New install
Rod McCown aircanopy.net> writes:
> ...
Hi,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
&
Rod McCown aircanopy.net> writes:
> ...
Hi,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
> 512 MB of RAM on.
> ...
Ys ... :-)
> I just tried on a AMD K6-2 500Mhz machine and it says this
> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
The released binaries are not for i686, they are for i686 *plus* some
extensions - one of which happens to be cmov.
Alan
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedorap
> While waiting for the (clears throat) definitive answer from this
> list, you might want to try Googling CMOV and pondering what comes up.
> Among other things, I wonder if the problem isn't the way the
> instruction is (or isn't) detected (or, alternately, how CMOV is
> implemented by a particu
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:24:32 -0500
"Rod McCown" wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the
> "Fedora 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office
> that I can get 512 MB of RAM on. The disk will boot my laptop, but
> unfortunately it is
On 09/17/2010 09:08 PM, Darr wrote:
> On Saturday, 18 September, 2010 @00:51 zulu, JD scribed:
>
>> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
> Live spins, yeah... but the OP should be able to install the i386 version
> from DVD or CDs.
>
> e.g.
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/relea
On Saturday, 18 September, 2010 @00:51 zulu, JD scribed:
> All released binaries are for the i686 architecture.
Live spins, yeah... but the OP should be able to install the i386 version
from DVD or CDs.
e.g.
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/releases/13/Fedora/i386/iso/
--
users mailing list
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Rod McCown wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
> 512 MB of RAM on. The disk will boot my laptop, but unfortunately it is a
> c
On 09/17/2010 05:46 PM, Jonathan Beatty wrote:
> That chip isn't technically i686 and you'll need to use a 386 distro
> with it, as far as I know.
>
> On 9/17/10, Rod McCown wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
>> 13 desktop" on the on
That chip isn't technically i686 and you'll need to use a 386 distro
with it, as far as I know.
On 9/17/10, Rod McCown wrote:
> Hello all,
> I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
> 13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
> 51
Hello all,
I just finished with a RedHat class and am trying to run the "Fedora
13 desktop" on the only thing that I have left in my office that I can get
512 MB of RAM on. The disk will boot my laptop, but unfortunately it is a
company laptop and I cannot put anything else on it. But I kno
On 06/13/2010 01:51 AM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> IIRC, you might be having an SELINUX issue. Check to see if SELINUX does
> not like the labeling on the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 file.
>
restorecon -R -v ~/.ssh
Will fix the problem. You have to have the correct labels in order for
sshd to reach the
sean darcy writes:
> On 06/12/2010 09:34 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>>
>> Craig White writes:
>>> sounds like you created the file elsewhere (or even on another computer)
>>> and moved it into place thereby creating SELinux issue.
>>
>> That would be my guess too, seeing how it happens to
IIRC, you might be having an SELINUX issue. Check to see if SELINUX does
not like the labeling on the ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 file.
--
Chris Kloiber
On 06/13/2010 01:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/12/2010 09:33 AM, sean darcy wrote:
New install of F13.
drwx--. 2 root root 4096 Jun 11
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
