On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:16:16 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I guess I'll poke around some more and see if I can figure
> out what the delay is all about.
Ah-HA! Need to turn off STP on the bridge:
nmcli con modify br0 bridge.stp no
The original web page mentioned I could do that, but
didn't say why
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 17:53:59 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> > # nmcli con mod net-eth0 ipv4.ignore-auto-dns yes
>
> Sounds like what I want, I've just resurrected an old
> system and installed f31 so I can try experimenting
> with network manager. I'll see how it goes. Thanks.
I've been experiment
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 8:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear
> entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the
> first question I haven't been able to find an answer
> for:
>
> What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection
> us
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 19:55 -0600, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users
wrote:
> There is no technical reason for AT&T to lock this down. I might
> understand this for the VOIP and IPTV segments of the gateway. Those
> probably have very complex and proprietary DHCP configurations. But
> for the Interne
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 19:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/16/2020 06:55 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
> > U-verse does not allow the user to change the Primary DNS address
> > on the
> > residential gateway's DHCP configuration page. It is hard-coded to
> > 192.168.1.254, which is t
On 02/16/2020 06:55 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
U-verse does not allow the user to change the Primary DNS address on the
residential gateway's DHCP configuration page. It is hard-coded to
192.168.1.254, which is the gateway itself. I want to change that to
192.168.1.1 which is
On Sun, 2020-02-16 at 14:43 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/16/2020 02:39 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
> > AT&T U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their
> > residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP
> > sessions.
>
> How? Does the router block ou
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:47:42 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> # nmcli con mod net-eth0 ipv4.ignore-auto-dns yes
Sounds like what I want, I've just resurrected an old
system and installed f31 so I can try experimenting
with network manager. I'll see how it goes. Thanks.
__
On 2020-02-17 03:36, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear
> entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the
> first question I haven't been able to find an answer
> for:
>
> What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection
> using nmcli whic
On 02/16/2020 02:39 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote:
AT&T U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their
residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP sessions.
How? Does the router block outgoing DNS requests?
__
I would like to know the answer to this also, but probably for a
different reason.
AT&T U-verse customers are forced to use the DNS service in their
residential gateway, which would be fine for IPTV and VOIP sessions.
However, if I want to install a Raspberry Pi device running Pi-Hole as
my primar
On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 14:36:42 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear
> entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the
> first question I haven't been able to find an answer
> for:
>
> What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection
>
I keep seeing signs that "network" will someday disappear
entirely and I'll be forced to use NetworkManager, so the
first question I haven't been able to find an answer
for:
What is the "proper" way to setup a network connection
using nmcli which will get an IP via DHCP, but will ignore
the DHCP p
13 matches
Mail list logo
