Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-27 Thread Ian Chapman
On 27/11/14 00:23, poma wrote: $ find -name config* -exec grep -H CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER {} \; ./kernel-3.15.0-0.rc0.git12.1.fc21.x86_64/boot/config-3.15.0-0.rc0.git12.1.fc21.x86_64:# CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER is not set OK, so it's probably not been enabled intentionally. Looks

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-26 Thread poma
On 26.11.2014 11:34, Ian Chapman wrote: > On 25/11/14 20:40, poma wrote: > >>> Is svcrdma intentionally not built in the current kernels or has it been >>> replaced by something else? >>> > >> $ find -name config* -exec grep -H CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER {} \; >> ./kernel-3.15.0-0.rc0.git12.1

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-26 Thread Ian Chapman
On 25/11/14 23:03, Chuck Lever wrote: Chuck, what is the current recommendation for 'CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER’? The server in 3.17 and later kernels no longer crashes regularly. That's good, at least F20 is on 3.17+ now. As to whether you should re-enable it, here’s full disclosure:

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-26 Thread Ian Chapman
On 25/11/14 20:40, poma wrote: Is svcrdma intentionally not built in the current kernels or has it been replaced by something else? $ find -name config* -exec grep -H CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER {} \; ./kernel-3.15.0-0.rc0.git12.1.fc21.x86_64/boot/config-3.15.0-0.rc0.git12.1.fc21.x86_64:#

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 21:49, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 21:07 +0100, poma wrote: >> On 25.11.2014 20:59, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> Answers can be precise without actually being helpful. Yours tend to >>> lack context that would allow people to easily understand them. In the >>> future, it woul

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 20:59, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:34:15PM +0100, poma wrote: >> On 25.11.2014 18:57, Paul Bolle wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 15:40 +0100, poma wrote: [snip unedited copy from someone's reply] >>> >>> I assume you removed me from the lists of recipients by

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 18:57, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 15:40 +0100, poma wrote: >> [snip unedited copy from someone's reply] > > I assume you removed me from the lists of recipients by accident. > >> [PATCH] xprtrdma: add separate Kconfig options for NFSoRDMA client and >> server support

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 16:03, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2014, at 9:26 AM, poma wrote: > >> On 25.11.2014 14:29, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:12:08PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:40 +0100, poma wrote: > On 25.11.2014 11:14, Ian Chapman wrote: >

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
[snip unedited copy from someone's reply] [PATCH] xprtrdma: add separate Kconfig options for NFSoRDMA client and server support http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg42168.html poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 14:29, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:12:08PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:40 +0100, poma wrote: >>> On 25.11.2014 11:14, Ian Chapman wrote: Hi, Is anyone successfully running NFS over RDMA on Fedora 20+? I've edited /et

Re: NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread poma
On 25.11.2014 11:14, Ian Chapman wrote: > Hi, > > Is anyone successfully running NFS over RDMA on Fedora 20+? > > I've edited /etc/sysconfig/nfs and set the the following config paramter. > > RDMA_PORT=20049 > > Upon restarting the nfs server I get the following: > > modprobe: FATAL: Module sv

NFS over RMDA

2014-11-25 Thread Ian Chapman
Hi, Is anyone successfully running NFS over RDMA on Fedora 20+? I've edited /etc/sysconfig/nfs and set the the following config paramter. RDMA_PORT=20049 Upon restarting the nfs server I get the following: modprobe: FATAL: Module svcrdma not found /usr/libexec/nfs-utils/scripts/nfs-server.pos