On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:22 AM Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 11/6/20 4:21 am, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:40 AM Stephen Morris
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/6/20 7:12 am, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
>
> I have the following statement in
> It is possible I'm not remembering it correctly. Some time back I had an
> issue where when I specified the mount point in fstab and manually
> issued the mount the mount would fail (I've forgotten the exact syntax
> of the error) and when I raised a query on this list I thought I was
> told to t
On 11/6/20 4:21 am, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:40 AM Stephen Morris wrote:
On 10/6/20 7:12 am, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
I have the following statement in fstab:
192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defau
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:40 AM Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 10/6/20 7:12 am, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris
>> wrote:
>>> I have the following statement in fstab:
>>>
>>> 192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
>>> nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defaults 0 0
>>>
>>
Sorry, you are confusing the option not causing an issue with it
actaully selecting version=1.
The option may not have caused an issue on f28, but as wikipedia says
and someone else says there never was NFS version 1 (on linux). It
would seem the behavior when you give it an incorrect mount now c
On 10/6/20 7:12 am, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
I have the following statement in fstab:
192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defaults 0 0
When I issue the command 'mount /mnt/nfs' it fails with the
following messages show
On 10/6/20 12:40 am, Roger Heflin wrote:
I used linux in 2.0.X kernels (vintage 1998), and we used version=2,
so I am going to guess there was never a version 1 on linux.
And wikipedia says this interesting bit I did not know:
Sun used version 1 only for in-house experimental purposes.
So I gue
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:14 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:54:30 +1000
> Stephen Morris wrote:
>
>> nfsvers=1
>
> I seriously doubt there is any support for nfs 1 left
> in the code (could be wrong).
>
> Depending on random variations every time the nfs
> utilities get updates, I've
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 1:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> I have the following statement in fstab:
>
> 192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
> nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defaults 0 0
>
> When I issue the command 'mount /mnt/nfs' it fails with the
> following messages shown in dmesg, which indi
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 23:01 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> There is also one other thing I don't understand. If I run dolphin,
> under the Remote Section in the left hand panel it shows the entry
> /mnt/HD/HD_a2:/mnt/nfs on 192.168.1.12 which matches the fstab entry,
> and when I click on that entr
I used linux in 2.0.X kernels (vintage 1998), and we used version=2,
so I am going to guess there was never a version 1 on linux.
And wikipedia says this interesting bit I did not know:
Sun used version 1 only for in-house experimental purposes.
So I guess that says no one outside of sun used ver
On 9/6/20 10:14 pm, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:54:30 +1000
Stephen Morris wrote:
nfsvers=1
I seriously doubt there is any support for nfs 1 left
in the code (could be wrong).
Depending on random variations every time the nfs
utilities get updates, I've had to sometimes
specify "
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:54:30 +1000
Stephen Morris wrote:
> nfsvers=1
I seriously doubt there is any support for nfs 1 left
in the code (could be wrong).
Depending on random variations every time the nfs
utilities get updates, I've had to sometimes
specify "proto=udp" as well as or instead of
the
Hi,
I have the following statement in fstab:
192.168.1.12:/mnt/HD/HD_a2 /mnt/nfs nfs
nfsvers=1,x-systemd.automount,defaults 0 0
When I issue the command 'mount /mnt/nfs' it fails with the
following messages shown in dmesg, which indicate that the mount seems
to be trying
14 matches
Mail list logo