On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:21:51 +0200
Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Wrt the mix of 32/64 bit packages (on my system), I would consider
> rebuilding them a nightmare..
Another thing you might consider: I installed the Fedora 21 Branched
since I got tired of waiting for an official alpha release. It works
OK f
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 16:21:51 +0200,
Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages
that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that
need to get rebuilt in order to link with the up
Once upon a time, Heinz Diehl said:
> On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages
> > that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that
> > need to get rebuilt in order to link with the updated mesa. I
On 15.08.2014, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there are 4 packages
> that have mesa as the start of their name. There will be some others that
> need to get rebuilt in order to link with the updated mesa. I can believe
> that the latter set could get
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Clemens Eisserer
wrote:
> Are there any unofficial reporsitories for Mesa-10.2 or 10.3 git?
> Reason is I've bought a few games on steam and would like to play
> them, but the Intel OpenGL driver in mesa 10.1 doesn't work well.
> Now with the proprietary drivers I
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 13:56:30 +0200,
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi Wolf,
Rebuilding the source rpm usually isn't a problem. You could get a 10.2.5
srpm from f21 or a 10.3 srpm from rawhide.
Mesa consists of about ~20 packages :/
Are you sure you're not counting rpms? It looks like there a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Chad Kellerman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Clemens Eisserer
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Wolf,
>>
>> > Rebuilding the source rpm usually isn't a problem. You could get a
>> 10.2.5
>> > srpm from f21 or a 10.3 srpm from rawhide.
>>
>> Mesa consists of abou
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Clemens Eisserer
wrote:
> Hi Wolf,
>
> > Rebuilding the source rpm usually isn't a problem. You could get a 10.2.5
> > srpm from f21 or a 10.3 srpm from rawhide.
>
> Mesa consists of about ~20 packages :/
>
Not sure if this can help or not... But, Intel has a vi
Hi Wolf,
> Rebuilding the source rpm usually isn't a problem. You could get a 10.2.5
> srpm from f21 or a 10.3 srpm from rawhide.
Mesa consists of about ~20 packages :/
Regards
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 13:40:35 +0200,
Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Are there any unofficial reporsitories for Mesa-10.2 or 10.3 git?
Reason is I've bought a few games on steam and would like to play
them, but the Intel OpenGL driver in mesa 10.1 doesn't work well.
Now with the proprietary drivers
Hi again,
>> Especially with the accelerated release cycle of Mesa, it would be
>> great if Fedora could keep up in the same manner as it does with the
>> kernel.
>> Mesa 10.1 is effectively dead with 10.2 beeing considered "old, stable
>> and boring" now.
>> So the descision is not between shippi
On 08/03/2014 09:37 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Especially with the accelerated release cycle of Mesa, it would be
great if Fedora could keep up in the same manner as it does with the
kernel.
Mesa 10.1 is effectively dead with 10.2 beeing considered "old, stable
and boring" now.
So the descision
Hi,
First of all thanks for Fedora, I am a (most-time) happy user since
Fedora 2 and it is really great to see how all the improvements
accumulated over time.
Especially with the accelerated release cycle of Mesa, it would be
great if Fedora could keep up in the same manner as it does with the
ke
13 matches
Mail list logo
