On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Tim via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 30 April 2018, JD sent:
> > I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
> > more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
> >
> > About 30 minutes after I sent the emai
Allegedly, on or about 30 April 2018, JD sent:
> I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
> more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
>
> About 30 minutes after I sent the email, it's i/o load
> wen down back to near zero.
Perhaps a thumbnailer plug-in trawling through l
top shows cpu load, and not i/o load. Usually processes
that are i/o bound consume less cpu time, due to having
to wait for the completion of each i/o operation.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:36:08PM -0600, JD wrote:
> > I have not seen this befo
iotop shows it to consume that much i/o bandwidth.
I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
About 30 minutes after I sent the email, it's i/o load
wen down back to near zero.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 04/29/2018 11:36 AM, JD wrote:
I have not seen this before, so I do not know what might be causing this.
All tasks are quiescent, except that I am watching a youtube video.
So I stopped the YT video and waited to see if the activity of Caja
would abate. NOP!!! It stays at 92 to 98 %
How do y
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:36:08PM -0600, JD wrote:
> I have not seen this before, so I do not know what might be causing this.
> All tasks are quiescent, except that I am watching a youtube video.
> So I stopped the YT video and waited to see if the activity of Caja
> would abate. NOP!!! It stays
I have not seen this before, so I do not know what might be causing this.
All tasks are quiescent, except that I am watching a youtube video.
So I stopped the YT video and waited to see if the activity of Caja
would abate. NOP!!! It stays at 92 to 98 %
_
