I forgot to add, that Ed Greshko fixed the problems in the Ralink
driver to get it working on Fedora. he sure saved me a big headache.
Thanks again Ed and JD
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Ed I put a post on http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/
Subj: Getting the Linksys WUSB600N ver. 2 working on Fedora , 8-10-2010
I tried to make it as simple as possible, by just posting the two
modified files, if you want to comment on it.
--
users mailing list
users
On 08/10/2010 08:38 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> I forgot to ask, Will this compile okay on X86_64 vanilla Kernel ?
My guess is yes...assuming you have all the needed headers and such
installed.
I can't say that it will with 100% certainty since I don't have a x86_64
vanilla kernel syste
On 08/10/2010 08:35 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> PERFECT ! THANK YOU VERY MUCH ED !! And thank you JD for
> Your help.
>
> ED I would like to put this out on a couple of Fedora Help Forums ,
> there are many people out there that have tackled this with no success.
You are welc
On 08/09/2010 08:35 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> PERFECT ! THANK YOU VERY MUCH ED !! And thank you JD for
> Your help.
>
> ED I would like to put this out on a couple of Fedora Help Forums ,
> there are many people out there that have tackled this with no success.
>
> Could you
PERFECT ! THANK YOU VERY MUCH ED !! And thank you JD for
Your help.
ED I would like to put this out on a couple of Fedora Help Forums ,
there are many people out there that have tackled this with no success.
Could you send me the changes, to what files you did, and any comments.
Wo
On 08/09/2010 02:22 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>I was running the rpm -ivh and all of a sudden I get this, I didn't
> install a Group mockbuild
>
>
> warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
> warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
> warning: group mockbuild do
On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 04:29 PM, JD wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 12:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrot
On 08/10/2010 06:20 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 06:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/10/2010 04:53 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Yes I made the changes and the latest "make" dump is at
>>> http://fpaste.org/bAoE/
>> I do not believe you made the correct changes
On 08/10/2010 06:20 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 06:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/10/2010 04:53 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Yes I made the changes and the latest "make" dump is at
>>> http://fpaste.org/bAoE/
>> I do not believe you made the correct changes
On 08/09/2010 06:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 04:53 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Yes I made the changes and the latest "make" dump is at
>> http://fpaste.org/bAoE/
> I do not believe you made the correct changes
>
> The line 6 from your pastbin shows...
>
> cp -f os/linux
On 08/10/2010 04:53 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Yes I made the changes and the latest "make" dump is at
> http://fpaste.org/bAoE/
I do not believe you made the correct changes
The line 6 from your pastbin shows...
cp -f os/linux/Makefile.4
/home/jim/Downloads/RT3572/2010_0709_RT357
I was running the rpm -ivh and all of a sudden I get this, I didn't
install a Group mockbuild
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist -
On 08/09/2010 04:29 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 12:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> No It did not
>
OK, Mr. binary - so wha
On 08/09/2010 04:29 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 12:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> No It did not
>
OK, Mr. binary - so wha
On 08/09/2010 03:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
No It did not
>>> OK, Mr. binary - so what was the original compilation error message
>>>
On 08/09/2010 12:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
No It did not
>>> OK, Mr. binary - so what was the original compilation error message
>>>
On 08/10/2010 02:39 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
>>On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> No It did not
>>>
>> OK, Mr. binary - so what was the original compilation error message
>> that prompted you to start this thread?
>>
>> Also, do
On 08/09/2010 02:01 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> No It did not
>>
> OK, Mr. binary - so what was the original compilation error message
> that prompted you to start this thread?
>
> Also, do you or do you not want to work with a working rt2860 driver
>
On 08/09/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> No It did not
>
OK, Mr. binary - so what was the original compilation error message
that prompted you to start this thread?
Also, do you or do you not want to work with a working rt2860 driver
which I offered to send you?
--
users mailing l
On 08/10/2010 12:11 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 10:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> "findstring 2.9"
> Ed the "findstring 2.9", shouldn't that be 2.6 ?
NONOand HELL NO
If the match happensit will do its 2.4 thing. So, 2.6 and 2.4 will
match 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc1
On 08/09/2010 11:59 PM, JD wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
>>> figure out what is "broken".
>> Ah hah
>>
>> I see the problembut not sure how to fix
On 08/09/2010 09:31 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Yeah, your right about that.
>
>2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686
>
> Can it also be compiled on a X86_64
I do not think so. 2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686 does not have this
function defined either.
If you download the source rpm of 2.6.33.6-147
On 08/09/2010 12:27 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 09:14 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have th
On 08/09/2010 09:14 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
figure out what is "broken"
On 08/09/2010 11:59 AM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
>>> figure out what is "broken".
>> Ah hah
>>
>> I see the problembut not sure how to f
On 08/09/2010 10:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> "findstring 2.9"
Ed the "findstring 2.9", shouldn't that be 2.6 ?
This error in /common/rtusb_dev_id.c rtusb_dev_id.c:104:29: error:
invalid digit "9" , does 104:29 mean line and character number ?
If so , line# 104 is, {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0
On 08/09/2010 06:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
>> figure out what is "broken".
> Ah hah
>
> I see the problembut not sure how to fix yet.
>
> In the Makefile you see. a
On 08/09/2010 09:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> My wife and cats are yelling at me..
Escaped for a few minutes.
OK. To "fix" the build problem.
In both 2010_0709_RT3572_Linux_STA_v2.4.0.1/Makefile and os/linux/config.mk
find the lines that have "findstring 2.4" and replace it with
On 08/09/2010 09:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
>> figure out what is "broken".
> Ah hah
>
> I see the problembut not sure how to fix yet.
>
> In the Makefile you see. a
On 08/09/2010 09:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Unfortunately it is late in the day and I don't have the time now to
> figure out what is "broken".
Ah hah
I see the problembut not sure how to fix yet.
In the Makefile you see. at line 236
ifneq (,$(findstring 2.4,$(LINUX_SRC)))
Wel
On 08/09/2010 09:42 AM, JD wrote:
>On 08/09/2010 05:06 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> The compile didn't even get this far before
On 08/09/2010 05:06 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
Added
On 08/09/2010 08:21 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Here is a copy of the Make file,
> Is there a possibility that the kernel2.6.33.6-147.2.4.fc13.i686 is the
> wrong kernel to compile this Make file with.
>
Yes
I just updated my system and now believe I have the same error you do.
The f
On 08/09/2010 09:19 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 08:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/09/2010 08:48 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Ed I can't get the complete output showing of 'make' to show in
>>> console,
>>> what command can I use to send it a /home/jim/rt.txt
>>
On 08/09/2010 08:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 08:48 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Ed I can't get the complete output showing of 'make' to show in console,
>> what command can I use to send it a /home/jim/rt.txt
>>
>> I have tried ;
>>
>> make> /home/jim/rt.txt
>>
>> But all I
On 08/09/2010 08:48 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Ed I can't get the complete output showing of 'make' to show in console,
> what command can I use to send it a /home/jim/rt.txt
>
> I have tried ;
>
> make > /home/jim/rt.txt
>
> But all I get is 4 lines of output
make &>/home/jim/rt.txt
--
On 08/09/2010 08:16 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 08:06 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> The compile didn't even get this far bef
On 08/09/2010 08:06 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
Added
On 08/09/2010 08:06 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>>On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
Added {USB
On 08/08/2010 07:46 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>>>
>>>
>>> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
>
On 08/08/2010 07:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>>
>>
>> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
>> /common/rtusb_dev_id.c file
>>
>> And m
On 08/08/2010 04:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>>
>>
>> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
>> /common/rtusb_dev_id.c file
>>
>> And m
On 08/09/2010 07:23 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> The compile didn't even get this far before changes were made below.
>
>
> Added {USB_DEVICE(0×1737,0×0079)}, /* Linksys WUSB600N v2 */to
> /common/rtusb_dev_id.c file
>
> And modify /os/linux/config.mk file
>
> # Supp
On 08/08/2010 07:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 12:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> I downloaded the RT3572.tar.gz from Ralink and made the changes
>> required, but it won't compile with "make"
>> I have kernel-headers and kernel-devel installed.
>>
> Did you first try without m
On 08/09/2010 12:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> I downloaded the RT3572.tar.gz from Ralink and made the changes
> required, but it won't compile with "make"
> I have kernel-headers and kernel-devel installed.
>
Did you first try without making changes?
What changes did you make?
--
J
On 08/08/2010 01:24 PM, JD wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 09:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
WUSB600N.
>>
On 08/08/2010 09:18 AM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
>>> WUSB600N.
>>>
>>> That means it has a different chipset t
On 08/08/2010 11:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
>> WUSB600N.
>>
>> That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 .
> FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know
On 08/08/2010 11:08 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> Well one thing for sure, The RT2860 does NOT WORK with the Ver. 2 of the
> WUSB600N.
>
> That means it has a different chipset than Ver. 1 .
FWIW, I don't have a WUSB600N. I also don't know, and didn't make the
claim that the WUSB600N has a
On 08/07/2010 10:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 09:51 AM, JD wrote:
>> It's good to hear there is another person using the rt2860.
>> I just wonder when will the kernel dev team will finally fix
>> the rt2860 driver already in the staging drivers and make it
>> work.
>> What I have he
On 08/07/2010 10:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 09:51 AM, JD wrote:
>> It's good to hear there is another person using the rt2860.
>> I just wonder when will the kernel dev team will finally fix
>> the rt2860 driver already in the staging drivers and make it
>> work.
>> What I have he
On 08/07/2010 08:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:51 AM, JD wrote:
>>On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> fedora 13
>>>
>>> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
>>>
>>> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
>>> they say a ve
On 08/08/2010 09:51 AM, JD wrote:
> It's good to hear there is another person using the rt2860.
> I just wonder when will the kernel dev team will finally fix
> the rt2860 driver already in the staging drivers and make it
> work.
> What I have heard from some fedorans is that the current driver
>
On 08/07/2010 05:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:51 AM, JD wrote:
>>On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>> fedora 13
>>>
>>> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
>>>
>>> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
>>> they say a ve
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 08:58:19AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 08:51 AM, JD wrote:
> > On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
> >>fedora 13
> >>
> >> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
> >>
> >> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless site
On 08/08/2010 08:51 AM, JD wrote:
> On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>>fedora 13
>>
>> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
>>
>> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
>> they say a ver.1 is supported but not ver. 2 ?
> The Linksys WUSB600
On 08/07/2010 03:56 PM, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
>fedora 13
>
> A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
>
> Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
> they say a ver.1 is supported but not ver. 2 ?
The Linksys WUSB600N driver is available in the unsupported
sec
fedora 13
A Linksys wireless WUSB600 ver. 2
Does anyone know about a Driver for this device , in all wireless sites
they say a ver.1 is supported but not ver. 2 ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
59 matches
Mail list logo
