On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
>> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant
>> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back to N
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>>
>> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
>> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant
>> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back t
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 23:52 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I'd give the URL of the old thread but I can't find it on the
> > list archives. My original post is from 17/12/2015 if you want to
> > search for it, but I'm afraid the new archive page defeats me. It
> > seems quite astoundingly slow a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few mon
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 12:36 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedorap
> > > roje
> > > ct.org/thread/EHMPKQNNV5B3KRBI6GI
On 04/19/2016 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproje
ct.org/thread/EHMPKQNNV5B3KRBI6GIMAFMUZH4WIVE7/
That's it, but how did you find it?
I went to the month you said you p
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
> which
> > fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant file
> seems
> > to be the way to go. It's now back to NAT.
> >
> Bridged networking doesn't use the vir
On 04/19/2016 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months
ago
that wasn't crea
On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This thread finally explains why you had a
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months
> > > ago
> > > that wasn't created by libvirt
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months ago
>> that wasn't created by libvirt but was messing up your dnsmasq setup!
>
> You have a good memory :-)
Sometimes.
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:31 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Is one supposed to know this by magic? I can't be the only one
> who's
> > had this problem. I read the Release Notes every time I update the
> > system and can't recall seeing it anywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> Note that a standard install has no
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Have you tried rebooting since then? Does it still work? I don't
> > > think you should have an ifcfg f
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried rebooting since then? Does it still work? I don't
>> think you should have an ifcfg file for that interface as you don't
>> want NetworkManager interacting with
On 19 April 2016 at 12:22, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 V
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt
> > > system
> > > for
> > > several months now
On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system
for
several months now and have had no problems up to now. However
recently
I've been getting error messages from W
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system
> for
> several months now and have had no problems up to now. However
> recently
> I've been getting error messages from Windows about the network being
> "unknown" a
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 20:13 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/17/2016 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > I get:
> >
> > Error starting network 'default': internal error: Network is
> > already
> > in use by interface virbr0.
> >
> > The "State" in the same window is shown as
On 04/17/2016 02:49 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I get:
Error starting network 'default': internal error: Network is already
in use by interface virbr0.
The "State" in the same window is shown as Inactive. The NetworkManager
status for virbr0 is Connected, which may explain the prob
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 12:07 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/17/2016 06:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system
> > for
> > several months now and have had no problems up to now. However
> > recently
> > I've been getting error
On 04/17/2016 06:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system for
several months now and have had no problems up to now. However recently
I've been getting error messages from Windows about the network being
"unknown" and my shared host/gue
I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system for
several months now and have had no problems up to now. However recently
I've been getting error messages from Windows about the network being
"unknown" and my shared host/guest volume is unavailable. On the most
recent attempt
23 matches
Mail list logo
