Re: Let's talk about compression rates

2011-01-22 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:44:47 -0800, S Mathias wrote: > > I presume kernel.org knows this. Why doesn't people use e.g.: XZ? People are switching over to this. Expect this to be the default for live images for F15. I measuered an 8.6% reduction in the games spin today. This is the difference

Re: Let's talk about compression rates

2011-01-22 Thread S Mathias
wow... http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=ihLLHyiT $ time 7z a -mx=9 linux-2.6.37.tar.7z linux-2.6.37.tar; echo; time xz -9 -z linux-2.6.37.tar; echo; ls -lS 7-Zip 9.13 beta Copyright (c) 1999-2010 Igor Pavlov 2010-04-15 p7zip Version 9.13 (locale=en_US.utf8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,2 CPUs) Scanning

Re: Let's talk about compression rates

2011-01-22 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 01/22/2011 06:44 AM, S Mathias wrote: > I presume kernel.org knows this. Why doesn't people use e.g.: XZ? > > This is the same as in PDF's. DJVU files could be amazing too. They could > compress [convert] a 400 MByte PDF to a 20 MByte DJVU. Amazing. > > Why don't these technologies spread?? >

Let's talk about compression rates

2011-01-22 Thread S Mathias
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=MwDnhknf $ ls -Sl total 461252 -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 111709730 Jan 22 11:06 linux-2.6.37.zip -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 93174605 Jan 22 11:03 linux-2.6.37.tar.gz -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 73552510 Jan 22 11:10 linux-2.6.37.tar.bz2 -rw-rw-r--. 1 g g 66333786 Jan 22 11:16 linux-2.6.37.7z