It did happen again after a /bin/reboot but then settled down to 1% after 2 or
3 hours.
On 7/1/24 9:27 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 08:11 -0700, richard emberson wrote:
Never Mind.
Within 2 hours of posting the original post, Idle CPU usage settled down less
than 1% and
this
On Thu, 2024-06-27 at 08:11 -0700, richard emberson wrote:
> Never Mind.
> Within 2 hours of posting the original post, Idle CPU usage settled down less
> than 1% and
> this morning it is still at less than 1%.
>
> Still its funny that Fedora/WayLand/KDE wanted to use so much CPU for the
> first
Never Mind.
Within 2 hours of posting the original post, Idle CPU usage settled down less
than 1% and
this morning it is still at less than 1%.
Still its funny that Fedora/WayLand/KDE wanted to use so much CPU for the first
hour or two
after a new install (note: during this time the disks were
On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 14:30 -0700, richard emberson wrote:
> Just upgraded from 6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 to 6.9.5-200.fc40.x86_64.
> With both using KDE Wayland.
> With 6.9.5-200.fc40 there is high idle CPU usage:
>
> around 35% for /usr/bin/plasmashell --no-respawn
> around 25% for /bin/kwin_wayland
Just upgraded from 6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 to 6.9.5-200.fc40.x86_64.
With both using KDE Wayland.
With 6.9.5-200.fc40 there is high idle CPU usage:
around 35% for /usr/bin/plasmashell --no-respawn
around 25% for /bin/kwin_wayland --wayland-fd 7 --socket wayland-0
--xwayland-fd 8 --xwayland-fd 9 --
