Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-13 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 13/06/14 19:08, Sudhir Khanger wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: I am not with or against using the package from upstream; but you could remove kmod-VirtualBox and install akmod-VirtualBox and that one doesn't depend of a specific kernel version as it's supposed to

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-13 Thread Sudhir Khanger
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 13/06/14 18:57, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Ahmad Samir >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> AFAICS, the RpmFusion package uses akmod not DKMS to build the kernel >>> module(s). >>> >>> With kmod you have two options eithe

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-13 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 13/06/14 18:57, Sudhir Khanger wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: AFAICS, the RpmFusion package uses akmod not DKMS to build the kernel module(s). With kmod you have two options either install kmod-VirtualBox which has pre-built kernel modules in which case you'll h

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-13 Thread Sudhir Khanger
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 11/06/14 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: >>> >>> Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found >>> RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules th

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-13 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 11/06/14 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules through kmod. Akmod can automatically build modules for you. So I have

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/11/14 23:39, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 21:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new >>> kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 16:40 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > > Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found > > RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules through kmod. > > Akmod > > can automatically bui

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:01 +0530, Sudhir Khanger wrote: > Do you have RPMFusions's VB or the one from Oracle's repo? I found > RPMFusion's build problematic as they provide modules through kmod. > Akmod > can automatically build modules for you. > > So I have switched to Oracle's version. It come

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 21:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new > > kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have > > failed now. Why would this be and how can I

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Sudhir Khanger
On Jun 11, 2014 6:13 PM, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote: > > On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel > Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules > (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine. > > Two comments: > > 1) I thought DK

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Paul Cartwright
On 06/11/2014 08:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel > Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules > (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine. I have virtualbox installed and I also have

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new > kernel automatically. This has happened in the past but seems to have > failed now. Why would this be and how can I fix it? Ohand BTW you may want to check /var/lib/dk

Re: Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/11/14 20:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel > Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules > (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine. Yes. And mine have built just fine. /usr/lib/

Kernel 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 won't boot: module problem

2014-06-11 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On trying to boot the above kernel, I get a "Failed to start Load Kernel Modules" error. This appears to be caused by missing vboxdrv modules (from VirtualBox). Booting an earlier kernel works fine. Two comments: 1) I thought DKMS was supposed to rebuild the VBox modules for each new kernel autom