On 11/29/2011 10:42 AM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> Very reassuring. So it's only the work involved in checking each one of
> thousands specs.
That, at least, can be automated. The big problem is deciding which of
the compiled classes that require version 7+ could run on earlier
versions b
On 11/29/2011 06:42 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> If I am, is there a timeframe for certified builds?
No.
>>>
>>> :-(
>>>
>>> Please, Red Hat, drop a few bucks for this! ;-)
>>
>> What has Red Hat's bucks got to do with this?
>
> Sorta kidding -- see the ;-) ?
>
> But isn't R
Hi,
If I am, is there a timeframe for certified builds?
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>> :-(
>>
>> Please, Red Hat, drop a few bucks for this! ;-)
>
>What has Red Hat's bucks got to do with this?
Sorta kidding -- see the ;-) ?
But isn't Red Hat kindgly giving time of some employees to work on IcedTea,
On 11/29/2011 03:33 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>>> If I am, is there a timeframe for certified builds?
>>
>> No.
>
> :-(
>
> Please, Red Hat, drop a few bucks for this! ;-)
What has Red Hat's bucks got to do with this?
>>> And while we're talking about Java 7, I heard about s
Hi,
>> If I am, is there a timeframe for certified builds?
>
>No.
:-(
Please, Red Hat, drop a few bucks for this! ;-)
>> And while we're talking about Java 7, I heard about serious problems
>> preventing some open source packages like Lucene from running under
>> Java 7 on production setting
On 11/29/2011 11:33 AM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
>> Original Message
>> From: Andrew Haley
>> Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 12:13 PM
>>
>>> And what about certification? Is there a TCK for Java 7? Will OpenJDK 7 on
>>> Fedora be certified for Fedora 16 at release or at a later update?
>>
Hi there,
Resuming an old thread, just to clarify one point:
> Original Message
>From: Andrew Haley
>Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 12:13 PM
>
>> And what about certification? Is there a TCK for Java 7? Will OpenJDK 7 on
>> Fedora be certified for Fedora 16 at release or at a later update?
>
>
On 11/04/2011 05:05 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Top posting is considered bad manners in most technical fora because it
> reverses the normal order of conversations, putting the answer before
> the question.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting su
On 11/04/2011 09:52 AM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks a lot. But I don't understand, what is "top-post" ?
Top post is what you did when you put your reply at the top of the
message instead of below the quoted text as is considered proper for
this mailing list. Yes, I know
On 11/04/2011 04:52 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> But I don't understand, what is "top-post" ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting
Andrew.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Hi there,
Thanks a lot. But I don't understand, what is "top-post" ?
[]s, Fernando Lozano
> Original Message
>From: Andrew Haley
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 14:50 PM
>Subject: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea
&g
On 11/04/2011 04:43 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
>> From: Andrew Haley
>>
>>> And I guess correctly openjdk6/7 packages in Ubuntu and Debian are
>>> also built from IcedTea? Certification is the same for them or each
>>> linux distro has to make their own certification?
>>
>> The latter: onl
Hi there,
You simply run the TCK for each package update? Or is it a more involved
process, with auditing and etc?
[]s Fernando Lozano
> Original Message
>From: Andrew Haley
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 13:01 PM
>Subject: Re: JDK 7 sta
On 11/04/2011 02:35 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> And about OpenJDK6 packates included on Fedora, I guess they are
> also built using IcedTea. But are they certified?
Yes.
> And I guess correctly openjdk6/7 packages in Ubuntu and Debian are
> also built from IcedTea? Certification is the s
linux distro has to
make their own certification?
[]s, Fernando Lozano
> Original Message
>From: Andrew Haley
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Sent: Sex, Nov 4, 2011, 12:13 PM
>Subject: Re: JDK 7 status and IcedTea
>
>On 11/04/2011 02:05 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.b
On 11/04/2011 02:05 PM, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
>
> I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the default
> Java for Fedora, such as:
> http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html
>
> But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the default, which
* ferna...@lozano.eti.br [2011-11-04 10:05]:
>Hi there,
>I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the
>default Java for Fedora, such as:
>http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html
>But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the d
Hi there,
I saw messages on the archives stating that OpenJDK 7 would be the default
Java for Fedora, such as:
http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2011-08/msg01586.html
But the features page states that OpenJDK 6 will be the default, which
OpenJDK 7 as an optional preview:
https://fedoraproject
18 matches
Mail list logo
