Michael Schwendt writes:
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:54:16 -0400, SV wrote:
> And I still find no equivalent settings for having my input focus follow
the
> mouse pointer, and for windows to autoraise upon gaining focus.
Ironically, these old settings do still work in GNOME Shell, too:
gconft
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:54:16 -0400, SV wrote:
> And I still find no equivalent settings for having my input focus follow the
> mouse pointer, and for windows to autoraise upon gaining focus.
Ironically, these old settings do still work in GNOME Shell, too:
gconftool-2 --set -t bool /apps/met
On 05/30/2011 12:33 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/29/2011 08:26 PM, jdow wrote:
>> This may be informative and may help.
>>
>> "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457";
>>
>
> That bug has to do with the hidden Power Off button, but I think I can
> extrapolate from it. Thanx.
When i
On 05/29/2011 08:26 PM, jdow wrote:
> This may be informative and may help.
>
> "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457";
>
That bug has to do with the hidden Power Off button, but I think I can
extrapolate from it. Thanx.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 2011/05/29 16:39, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/29/2011 12:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design
>>
>> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/FAQ
>>
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>
> All I could find on any of these sites that seemed relevan
On 05/29/2011 12:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design
>
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/FAQ
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
All I could find on any of these sites that seemed relevant (I didn't
take the time to go hunting throug
On 5/29/2011 4:05 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>
>> Did you install the Guest Additions and run the script to compile the
>> Vbox drivers?
>
> I could have sworn that I had, but I went through this process again
> anyway, and sure enough, the install of guest additions behaved very
> differently this ti
> Did you install the Guest Additions and run the script to compile the
> Vbox drivers?
I could have sworn that I had, but I went through this process again
anyway, and sure enough, the install of guest additions behaved very
differently this time. Last time, I had not yet run the guest on a
syst
On Sun, 29 May 2011 12:01:51 -0700
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/29/2011 11:51 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> > Because that was hashed out a long time ago in the F15 alpha days
> > and on the Gnome mailing lists. Now, it is what it it is.
>
> Please understand that my interest is only academic; I don't u
On 05/29/2011 11:51 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Because that was hashed out a long time ago in the F15 alpha days and on
> the Gnome mailing lists. Now, it is what it it is.
Please understand that my interest is only academic; I don't use Gnome
any more. Gnome can go in whatever direction it want
On 05/29/2011 01:42 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/29/2011 11:26 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
>> Seems to be a very delicate thing. In that case, they are talking about
>> Vbox running with F15 as the host OS and an Ubuntu 11.04 guest running
>> Gnome Shell
>
> Am I the only person on this list that finds it
Greg Woods ucar.edu> writes:
> Seems to be a very delicate thing. In that case, they are talking about
> Vbox running with F15 as the host OS and an Ubuntu 11.04 guest running
> Gnome Shell. What I am trying to do (basically following those
> instructions) is to run an F15 guest with Vbox running
On 05/29/2011 11:26 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> Seems to be a very delicate thing. In that case, they are talking about
> Vbox running with F15 as the host OS and an Ubuntu 11.04 guest running
> Gnome Shell
Am I the only person on this list that finds it odd that not one of the
posts in this thread h
On 5/29/2011 2:26 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 21:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I just know of reports of it working with the
>> latest version. For instance
>>
>> http://www.webupd8.org/2011/05/virtualbox-408-released-with-gnome.html
>
> Seems to be a very delicate thing.
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 21:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I just know of reports of it working with the
> latest version. For instance
>
> http://www.webupd8.org/2011/05/virtualbox-408-released-with-gnome.html
Seems to be a very delicate thing. In that case, they are talking about
Vbox runnin
On 05/29/2011 09:05 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>
> I have been unable to get this to work. I am using Vbox 4.0.8 (latest
> version) and the Nvidia proprietary drivers. I have checked "enable 3D
> acceleration" in the Vbox settings for this VM. But Gnome 3 still starts
> in fallback mode. What else is ne
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 20:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> GNOME 3 runs fine on a VM including the fallback mode. GNOME Shell also
> runs on a VM if you look at the latest version of VirtualBox.
I have been unable to get this to work. I am using Vbox 4.0.8 (latest
version) and the Nvidia propr
> being done by Adam Jackson from Red Hat to include support for software
> rendering of GNOME Shell or more accurately, Clutter, the toolkit used
> by GNOME Shell. This is not done yet and it is not clear how efficient
> it would be
Is this pure software or using 2D acceleration where possible.
On 05/29/2011 08:25 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> They have the power to say "not ready" though. And the alpha of fc15
> shipped
> with a GNOME3 which runs in a VM and doesn't require a magic video card. Was
> that capability deliberately removed from the final fc15, or was it part of
> the
> offic
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2011 17:27:36 -0400
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>> I am not too surprised about GNOME3, but I thought the Fedora
>> decision making group were better people than that and would offer
>> GNOME2 for some length of time rather than offer no option at al
Peter Boy wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 17:27 -0400 schrieb Bill Davidsen:
>> Learning new things is good, having to learn a new way to do the old
>> things, not so much.
>
> That is exactly my problem as well. Unfortunately I couldn't spent the
> time over the last months to make my own exp
On Sat, 28 May 2011 17:27:36 -0400
Bill Davidsen wrote:
...snip...
> I am not too surprised about GNOME3, but I thought the Fedora
> decision making group were better people than that and would offer
> GNOME2 for some length of time rather than offer no option at all but
> retrain. That might ma
Peter Boy writes:
Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 17:27 -0400 schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> Learning new things is good, having to learn a new way to do the old
> things, not so much.
That is exactly my problem as well. Unfortunately I couldn't spent the
time over the last months to make my own experien
Am Samstag, den 28.05.2011, 17:27 -0400 schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> Learning new things is good, having to learn a new way to do the old
> things, not so much.
That is exactly my problem as well. Unfortunately I couldn't spent the
time over the last months to make my own experiences using the betas
Bill Davidsen writes:
Retraining users to use GNOME3 and finding new tools to do old tasks is as
productive as a decision to change from left hand to right hand drive cars
while
learning a from an instruction manual written in a language they have to
learn
first. Learning new things is good
On 05/28/2011 02:27 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Hubris? Developers infected with a "Windows Mentality" virus which causes them
> to feel that providing a consistent user interface the user can't change is
> morally superior to the "Have it your way" approach.
You may be right in general. I don't k
Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/28/2011 05:31 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>> My biggest culture shock is losing all of my desktop icons.
>
> Now this is something I just can't understand. I don't want to start an
> argument, but does anybody know why this decision was made?
Hubris? Developers infected
On 05/28/2011 11:08 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Install gnome-tweak-tool and select "Have the File Manager handle the
> desktop".
Thank you, but that doesn't answer my question. And, as I now use XFCE
not Gnome, I have no need of gnome-tweak-tool. Still, it may help those
of you using Gnome 3.
-
Steven Stern writes:
On 05/28/2011 12:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/28/2011 05:31 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>> My biggest culture shock is losing all of my desktop icons.
>
> Now this is something I just can't understand. I don't want to start an
> argument, but does anybody know why this
On 05/28/2011 12:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/28/2011 05:31 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>> My biggest culture shock is losing all of my desktop icons.
>
> Now this is something I just can't understand. I don't want to start an
> argument, but does anybody know why this decision was made?
Inst
On 05/28/2011 05:31 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> My biggest culture shock is losing all of my desktop icons.
Now this is something I just can't understand. I don't want to start an
argument, but does anybody know why this decision was made?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sam Varshavchik writes:
After updating F14 to F15, my user account was automatically reconfigured to
launch the new gnome shell.
I'd like to switch back to metacity, at least for a while, but I am unable
to find any way to do it through any of the available GUIs.
How do I switch back to m
After updating F14 to F15, my user account was automatically reconfigured to
launch the new gnome shell.
I'd like to switch back to metacity, at least for a while, but I am unable
to find any way to do it through any of the available GUIs.
How do I switch back to metacity?
My biggest cultu
33 matches
Mail list logo
