On 18/6/20 10:35 pm, Neal Becker wrote:
Hi, I'm running F32 on a hi-dpi screen, with kde+wayland.
I find I get good results by going to font settings, and choosing
Force dpi, and selecting 120 rather than the default 96. This
produces a warning that the recommended approach is to instea
Hi, I'm running F32 on a hi-dpi screen, with kde+wayland.
I find I get good results by going to font settings, and choosing Force
dpi, and selecting 120 rather than the default 96. This produces a warning
that the recommended approach is to instead use scaling. If I try scaling
the results
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 21:26 +, Łukasz Piekarski wrote:
> Hi Stan,
>
> Thank you for the answer and clarifying a few things.
>
> Lukas
A few suggestions when posting on these lists:
* Use a more readable quoting style (see almost every other message
here for examples). You
Hi Stan,
Thank you for the answer and clarifying a few things.
Lukas
On 5 mar 2020, 22:03 +0100, stan via users ,
wrote:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:37:02 +
Łukasz Piekarski wrote:
Hello,
My name is Łukasz, but to make things easier, I often write Lukas.
Hi Lukas, welcome to Fedora.
However
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:37:02 +
Łukasz Piekarski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Łukasz, but to make things easier, I often write Lukas.
Hi Lukas, welcome to Fedora.
> However, I would
> like to contribute more to Fedora and focus on one or two areas. I
> have a FAS
Hello,
My name is Łukasz, but to make things easier, I often write Lukas. I live in
Poland with my son and my fiancee. I'm working in e-commerce but my passions
are computers, software, programming, Linux systems and management. I'm using
Fedora 31 as my daily driver. I also have computers with
On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 07:00:01 -0600
PropAAS DBA wrote:
> On 08/10/2018 06:29 AM, PropAAS DBA wrote:
> > Can someone point me to how to properly change my boot / grub font
> > size?
> I also tried this, still no change
> # grub2-mkfont --size 24 -o /boot/grub2/DejaVuSans.ttf
> /usr/share/fonts/de
On 08/10/2018 06:29 AM, PropAAS DBA wrote:
Hi all;
I've done this on a new thinkpad with a 3840x2160 screen but it had no
affect on the grub boot text
# grub2-mkfont -s 14 -o /boot/grub2/DejaVuSansMono.pf2
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/
Hi all;
I've done this on a new thinkpad with a 3840x2160 screen but it had no
affect on the grub boot text
# grub2-mkfont -s 14 -o /boot/grub2/DejaVuSansMono.pf2
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Then I did this (changed the -s
Hi All;
I've installed Fedora 20 on a Dell XPS 15 with a 3200x1800 screen
It works well but I need a magnifying glass to see the text. I tried
going into
system settings for KDE and setting the default dpi which sort of works
for appps
but I still have a teeny tiny start menu and taskbar
On 05/22/2012 12:37 PM, Roberto Escobar Suárez wrote:
Well just a month ago, I used ntfs-3g and fuse to work with an
external HDD on Fedora Core 6, a few days ago system cannot save files
on my external HDD, I unmount HDD, and restart and it was the
solution, but now I can't create directories,
On 05/22/2012 12:37 PM, Roberto Escobar Suárez wrote:
Well just a month ago, I used ntfs-3g and fuse to work with an external
HDD on Fedora Core 6, a few days ago system cannot save files on my
external HDD,
FC6 reached its End Of Life several years ago. If you're still using
it, my best advi
Well just a month ago, I used ntfs-3g and fuse to work with an external HDD on
Fedora Core 6, a few days ago system cannot save files on my external HDD, I
unmount HDD, and restart and it was the solution, but now I can't create
directories, the message is:
mkdir: no se puede crear el directori
Community hey I just wanted to share this opportunity with you, I've been
making 200-300 dollars a day and I started only a week ago. Check out this news
article and it will show you how to get started, it's definitely easy enough
for you :)! http://news7cnbc.com/money
--
users mailing list
use
On 08/09/2010 03:58 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:18 +, g wrote:
>> not entirely true.
>
> Which bit? You quoted nothing.
true. i did '' more than i intended. yet from below, it seems that
you knew what 'bit' i meant. ;)
> e.g. This is a test is the
> same as a bare This is a
On 08/09/2010 09:39 AM, Tim wrote:
not entirely true.
gmail composed op's email, which has already been shown, without above
tags. only tagging used was "< b r >". [without spacing.]
a few of yahoo emails that i looked at do not contain tags you list.
they did contain more than just "< b r >".
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 03:12 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> So you are saying that I can write just a plain text message, label it
> as being html in the header, and the typical mail reader is going to
> pretend that any/all missing html tags are there, and then render and
> display the message as
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 03:27 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Aaahhh, well, so you are saying that an e-mail can contain both plain
> text version and html version of the same message simultaneously?
Yes, that's the main use of multipart/alternative. It means that the
message has multiple parts, an
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 19:35 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you'd like to propose this reasoned and conciliatory position to
> > the list administrators and propose that the Guidelines be changed.
>
> Conciliatory? N
On 08/09/2010 01:54 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> web pages work with 'html format', email works with 'html code'.
>
> I don't quite understand this. Can you elaborate what exactly is the
> difference?
web pages have an *RFC* compliant format that begins with, or similar;
[spacings added in wo
On 08/09/2010 02:27 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday, August 09, 2010 03:02:43 Tim wrote:
> Aaahhh, well, so you are saying that an e-mail can contain both plain text
> version and html version of the same message simultaneously?
if the email client composer or online email composer is se
On 08/09/2010 01:49 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this thread
> where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me. There was no
> mention of html context, nor any tags for line breaks.
that is because kmail is not _showi
On Monday, August 09, 2010 03:02:43 Tim wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 02:49 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this
> > thread where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me.
> > There was no mention of html context, nor a
On Monday, August 09, 2010 00:29:23 Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain
> > any html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
>
> A HTML message section doesn't actually have to have an
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 02:49 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But it seems this is not what I received. You can look back in this
> thread where I quoted the full OP message, as KMail showed it to me.
> There was no mention of html context, nor any tags for line breaks.
I received the original messa
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 20:53:24 g wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 02:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain any
> > html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
>
> there is a difference between 'html code' and 'html format'.
>
> we
mail filter) check the actual contents of
>>> the message for html stuff, rather than just blindly trust the
>>> message header?
>> His original message arrived here with the following stanza
>> (slightly modified so your mail client doesn't interpret it):
>&g
age for html stuff, rather than just blindly trust the
> > message header?
>
> His original message arrived here with the following stanza
> (slightly modified so your mail client doesn't interpret it):
>
> Content; t e x t / h t m l; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi!I&
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> Perhaps you'd like to propose this reasoned and conciliatory position to
> the list administrators and propose that the Guidelines be changed.
Conciliatory? No. Well reasoned? Yes. You just posted 5267
characters (5.14 k) to a few
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:37 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > That is true, but HTML mail is a bandwidth waster. I routinely get
> > messages with so much garbage in them that just delete them. This
> is
> > what this filter does, dumps HTML mail before it even gets read. We
> > need to remem
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain
> any html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
A HTML message section doesn't actually have to have any HTML tags, just
needs to be treated as if it might. i.
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:37 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> people waste more "bandwidth" than HTML email could ever dream of
> by rehashing this crap every other day
Though, if every mail came through as HTML, and *many* would if nobody
complained, the HTML would become the great bandwidth was
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, James McKenzie
wrote:
>>
> That is true, but HTML mail is a bandwidth waster. I routinely get
> messages with so much garbage in them that just delete them. This is
> what this filter does, dumps HTML mail before it even gets read. We
> need to remember that the
On 08/08/2010 07:53 PM, g wrote:
> On 08/08/2010 03:56 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
>
>
>> one of the arguments against HTML is that it is a waste of other
>> people's bandwidth.
>
> true.
>
>> Much like this discussion thread.
>
> not really. especially if op gains a better understanding and stops
>
On 08/08/2010 04:29 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
> Or am I misunderstanding something?
or something.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at
On 08/08/2010 03:56 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> one of the arguments against HTML is that it is a waste of other
> people's bandwidth.
true.
> Much like this discussion thread.
not really. especially if op gains a better understanding and stops
sending 'html'.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
***
On 08/08/2010 03:35 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
> It IMPLIES that there are mulitple parts, one of which can be text/html.
> The filter is picking up the message as HTML,
*not*
the filter is blocking message because of 'Content-Type: t e x t/h t m l'.
there is a difference. :)
--
peace out.
On 08/08/2010 03:17 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> To do that it would need to parse the contents (it's easy to construct a
> message that looks a lot like HTML but isn't, e.g. a plain text message
> discussing HTML syntax).
and why i have filter for 'Content-Type: t e x t/h t m l'
> Way too
On 08/08/2010 02:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> But this is just a declaration. The message doesn't actually contain any
> html code, AFAICS. Things like , , and other tags.
there is a difference between 'html code' and 'html format'.
web pages work with 'html format', email works with 'html c
suvayu ali wrote:
> On 8 August 2010 07:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking specifically
>> about
>> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html stuff,
>> rather
>> than just blindly trust the message header?
>>
>
On 8 August 2010 07:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking specifically
> about
> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html stuff,
> rather
> than just blindly trust the message header?
>
I don't understand all this fus
> As someone who actually doesn't care much if the mail is HTML or Text,
> can I just point out that one of the arguments against HTML is that it
> is a waste of other people's bandwidth.
>
> Much like this discussion thread.
Yes. Actually I agree with you.
And you too have just contributed to it
As someone who actually doesn't care much if the mail is HTML or Text,
can I just point out that one of the arguments against HTML is that it
is a waste of other people's bandwidth.
Much like this discussion thread.
--
Sam
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or cha
>>> why does a "multipart/mixed" declaration in the header make
>>> it html?
>>
>> It does not.
>>
> It IMPLIES that there are mulitple parts,
Huh? IMPLIES!? Of course multipart IMPLIES multiple-parts. Isn't that
fucking OBVIOUS?
> one of which can be text/html.
Or something else.
> The filte
der?
His original message arrived here with the following stanza
(slightly modified so your mail client doesn't interpret it):
Content; t e x t / h t m l; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi!I&-#39;m Arpad Attila Bakos, 25 years old guy interested in
open-source software and hardware,from Hungary.Workin
Takehiko Abe wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="===1539751590095400808=="
>>> This is HTML mail. If it were text, this would be text/plain...
>>>
>
> bah. HTML is text too. It's called "text/html", which is not
> "multipart/mixed"
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday, August 08, 2010 14:49:27 James McKenzie wrote:
>
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for
>>> not
>>>
>>> trimming anyth
>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>>
>>> boundary="===1539751590095400808=="
>>
>> This is HTML mail. If it were text, this would be text/plain...
bah. HTML is text too. It's called "text/html", which is not
"multipart/mixed". They are not related.
> why does a "multipart/mi
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 15:30 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> IOW, shouldn't the mail filter (generic one, I'm not talking
> specifically about
> g's mail filter) check the actual contents of the message for html
> stuff, rather
> than just blindly trust the message header?
To do that it would nee
On Sunday, August 08, 2010 14:49:27 James McKenzie wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for
> > not
> >
> > trimming anything):
> > Subject: Hi
> > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1rp=E1d_Attila_B
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Here is the message with full headers, as KMail sees it (forgive me for not
> trimming anything):
>
> Subject: Hi
> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C1rp=E1d_Attila_Bakos?=
>
He is using the GMail send agent, probably the Web Mail interface. It
creates
be it got caught by your spam filter or something.
>
> my spam filter *did not* catch them. it knows better.
>
> my thunderbird filter rule for "Content-Type: text/html" caught them;
>
> Applied filter "= html - Content-Type: text/html" to message from Árpád
catch them. it knows better.
my thunderbird filter rule for "Content-Type: text/html" caught them;
Applied filter "= html - Content-Type: text/html" to message from Árpád Attila
Bakos - [free-electronic-lab] Hi at 08/07/2010 07:10:19
AM moved message id =
a
y your spam filter or something. Here:
http://old.nabble.com/Hi-to29373157.html
HTH, :-)
Marko
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproje
Árpád Attila Bakos gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi!I'm Arpad Attila Bakos, 25 years old guy interested in open-source software
and hardware,from Hungary.Working as a repair technician at a world leader
mobile phone company I've met a Fedora ambassador, who adviced me to joi
On 08/07/2010 08:42 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 07/08/10 08:10, Arpad Attila Bakos wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I'm Arpad Attila Bakos, 25 years old guy interested in open-source
>> software and hardware,from Hungary.
>> Working as a repair technician at a world leader mo
On 07/08/10 08:10, Árpád Attila Bakos wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm Arpad Attila Bakos, 25 years old guy interested in open-source
> software and hardware,from Hungary.
> Working as a repair technician at a world leader mobile phone company
> I've met a Fedora ambassador, who advi
Hi!
I'm Arpad Attila Bakos, 25 years old guy interested in open-source software
and hardware,from Hungary.
Working as a repair technician at a world leader mobile phone company I've
met a Fedora ambassador, who adviced me to join FEL.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
On 24/06/10 19:17, jack craig wrote:
>>
> Boo Hiss...
>
Remember the "Snippidy Snip"
We've now seen it twice.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproj
On 06/24/2010 10:43 AM, Tom Weston wrote:
> Hello,One of my friends bought an iphone from a
> website: href="http://www.myfure.com";>www.myfure.comHe has got the
> phone, its quality is very good. And the website is promoting their
> products these days, so they have very good price and big disc
Hello,One of my friends bought an iphone from a
website: http://www.myfure.com";>www.myfure.comHe has got the
phone, its quality is very good. And the website is promoting their
products these days, so they have very good price and big discount
now. This website also sells tv,motor,laptop and so o
Yeah, I did subscribed that mailing list :). Thanks for the
suggestion, in any case :)
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 09:42 +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>> I'm glad to have joined this community occasionally in the past year
>> (since F
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 09:42 +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> I'm glad to have joined this community occasionally in the past year
> (since F11 has been released). I really think this is a healthy
> community :). Now, with F13, I decided to make the big step from
> Kubuntu to Fedora-KDE.
> So
Hello fedora user list :)
I'm glad to have joined this community occasionally in the past year
(since F11 has been released). I really think this is a healthy
community :). Now, with F13, I decided to make the big step from
Kubuntu to Fedora-KDE.
So, today I realized that I have subscribed a couple
64 matches
Mail list logo
