On 9/28/20 6:43 PM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:07:32 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 5:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
only 2 selection buffers. :-)
There are four.
:-) :-)
Fine, you made me look it up. I was partially wrong. The used buffers
are
On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:07:32 PM EDT Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/28/20 5:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >> only 2 selection buffers. :-)
> >
> > There are four.
> >
> > :-) :-)
>
> Fine, you made me look it up. I was partially wrong. The used buffers
> are CLIPBOARD and PRIMARY
On 9/28/20 5:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 17:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:47 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 15:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 3:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, To
On 2020-09-28 17:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:47 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 15:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 3:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard
On 9/28/20 4:47 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 15:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 3:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard (select and middle click) did not
work ei
On 2020-09-28 15:33, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 3:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard (select and middle click) did not
work either. RATS!
I have not tried the other two clipbo
On 9/28/20 3:07 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard (select and middle click) did not
work either. RATS!
I have not tried the other two clipboards because I can
never remember how to
On 2020-09-28 12:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard (select and middle click) did not
work either. RATS!
I have not tried the other two clipboards because I can
never remember how to use them
I've never heard of more than two.
He
On 9/28/20 4:24 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The primary clipboard (select and middle click) did not
work either. RATS!
I have not tried the other two clipboards because I can
never remember how to use them
I've never heard of more than two.
__
On 2020-09-28 03:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 01:45 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Anyone know a workaround? Any way to make GnuCash think I
am typing and not pasting?
At least on X11 (not sure about Wayland) there are two independent ways
of doing copy-
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 01:45 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Anyone know a workaround? Any way to make GnuCash think I
> am typing and not pasting?
At least on X11 (not sure about Wayland) there are two independent ways
of doing copy-paste.
One way is the familiar Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V com
Hi All,
Fedora 32, x64
Xfce 4.14
gnucash-4.1-1.fc32.x86_64
I have a situation where I have the Date, Number, Description, Transfer,
Payment, Charge loaded into the secondary clipboard (). (Linux
has four clipboards.)
When I paste (ctrl) into GnuCash, I can't get it to paste
a
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 16:55 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-04-16 16:22, David wrote:
> > I subtly mentioned in my last post, that I did not have the new version of
> > gnucash
> > installed natively, but instead as a flatpak from flathub.
> >
> > However,
On 2020-04-16 16:22, David wrote:
> I subtly mentioned in my last post, that I did not have the new version of
> gnucash
> installed natively, but instead as a flatpak from flathub.
>
> However, I just tested the gnucash flatpak version, and it did not work, so I
> removed the
I subtly mentioned in my last post, that I did not have the new version of
gnucash
installed natively, but instead as a flatpak from flathub.
However, I just tested the gnucash flatpak version, and it did not work, so
I removed the flatpak of gnucash.
I natively installed the new gnucash, and it
On 04/06/2018 10:37 AM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: SternData
>
> | Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
> | version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
>
> I'm looking forward to it because some gnucash
| From: SternData
| Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
| version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
I'm looking forward to it because some gnucash bugs were caused by
using an old version of webkit and 3.0 moves to a newer v
On 04/04/2018 03:48 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:53 AM, SternData
> mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
> version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
>
>
> L
Sort of makes sense to prioritize it for 28 I think.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:53 AM, SternData
wrote:
> Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
> version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
Looks like it's only been built for Fedora 28 so far...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15081
Version 3.0 was released the other day. Are there plans to update the
version in the repos? I don't see anything in updates-testing.
--
-- Steve
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.
h the blank space between checks 2 and 3:
>
> check 1
> check 2
> blank
> check 3
>
>
My wife (who is a much better Googler than I) found a discussion in a
Gnucash forum of exactly this issue:
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Problem-printing-checks-td4684960.html
The upshot of
I am asking this here because I don't think it's a gnucash issue
specifically. The gnucash package in F24 is the same version as in F23
(2.6.12-2) and I even checked the file in /usr/share/gnucash/checks where
the printing format is defined and it's identical to the one from F23
On 03/21/2015 08:08 PM, Donato Roque wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:10 -0600, Stuart McGraw wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a Fedora question or a Gnucash
question but I thought I'd start here...
I just installed fedora 21 and gnucash (a personal finance
app) from the f21 yum re
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:10 -0600, Stuart McGraw wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a Fedora question or a Gnucash
> question but I thought I'd start here...
>
> I just installed fedora 21 and gnucash (a personal finance
> app) from the f21 yum repo. Quite frequently when
I'm not sure if this is a Fedora question or a Gnucash
question but I thought I'd start here...
I just installed fedora 21 and gnucash (a personal finance
app) from the f21 yum repo. Quite frequently when I start
gnucash I will be asked for a password to unlock my keyring.
How do
Hi!
I tried them both and I find Kmymoney simpler and smaller than
Gnucash. But I really think that you should give both a try and see
which one fits you better.
Cheers,
SYLVIA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 08:45 -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Any further comments on either program are welcome.
I have used Gnucash for more than a decade for my personal finances. It
has worked well for me. I have never used Kmymoney so I can't really
comment or compare the two. If
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> It looks like Kmymoney is based on Gnucash, judging from today's update
> notes. Is this correct?
Not correct. They are both accounting/bookkeeping software packages that
happen to use aqbanking under-the-hood.
-- Rex
--
users mailing
It looks like Kmymoney is based on Gnucash, judging from today's update
notes. Is this correct? I'm trying to choose between them for keeping
track of my own finances, and this may simplify the choice. Any further
comments on either program are welcome.
jon
--
users mailing
On 01/21/2014 12:51 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:42:00 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
>
>> From yum:
>>
>> Transaction check error:
>> file /usr/share/gnome/help/gnucash-guide from install of
>> gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20.noarch conflic
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:42:00 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> From yum:
>
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/share/gnome/help/gnucash-guide from install of
> gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20.noarch conflicts with file from package
> gnucash-docs-2.4.2-2.fc20.noarch
> file
From yum:
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/gnome/help/gnucash-guide from install of
gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20.noarch conflicts with file from package
gnucash-docs-2.4.2-2.fc20.noarch
file /usr/share/gnome/help/gnucash-help from install of
gnucash-docs-2.6.0-1.fc20.noarch conflicts
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 09:50:16 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> FYI, GnuCash 2.6 is out. New features are listed here:
> http://gnucash.org/2.6-release-tour.phtml
See http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gnucash
-> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1047200
Upstream release monitoring has reported i
FYI, GnuCash 2.6 is out. New features are listed here:
http://gnucash.org/2.6-release-tour.phtml
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
against each wrong
package, or give up and just reinstall the machine 64-bit...
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:21:19 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
>> I have recently created a new 6tb XFS filesystem.
>>
>> After this gnuc
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:21:19 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> I have recently created a new 6tb XFS filesystem.
>
> After this gnucash, pan and a number of other utilities (on one of the
> 32-bit machines) start failing to work and complaining about value too
> large for defined dat
I have recently created a new 6tb XFS filesystem.
After this gnucash, pan and a number of other utilities (on one of the
32-bit machines) start failing to work and complaining about value too
large for defined data type.
I have found someone else that indicated this ment that the tools
needed to
When I find an invoice and click the button to edit an existing one or
click the button to add a new one, Gnucash is segfaulting.
Anyone else seeing this?
--
-- Steve
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
39 matches
Mail list logo
