On 22/07/13 17:09, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/22/2013 01:48 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
That's true and I thought the same but out of courtesy to the person
offering the susuggestion I tried it. Is there something wrong with
that?
No, of course not. I probably would have asked th
On 07/22/2013 01:48 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
That's true and I thought the same but out of courtesy to the person
offering the susuggestion I tried it. Is there something wrong with that?
No, of course not. I probably would have asked the same questions of
whoever suggeste
On 22/07/13 16:59, Deepak Bhole wrote:
Excellent, now it is getting somewhere. So the XFCE launcher may be
launching it with a different plugin directory, or it may be launching a
different copy of ff altogether.
Can you post the output of:
1. ps auxww | grep firefox
2. ps eww
is the pid of t
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:43]:
> On 22/07/13 16:26, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >16:10]:
> >>On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >>>15:51]:
> On 22/07/13 15:44,
On 22/07/13 16:13, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/22/2013 01:07 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
[root@box10 bobg]# setenforce 0
[root@box10 bobg]# getenforce
Permissive
I restarted Firefox. Still the error! Still "No plugins found." I did
not try reboot ...
Well, what did you expect? Did
On 22/07/13 16:26, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:10]:
On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:51]:
On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
This is what I have:
[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternative
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
16:10]:
> On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
> >15:51]:
> >>On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>This is what I have:
> >>>
> >>>[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so
On 07/22/2013 01:07 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
[root@box10 bobg]# setenforce 0
[root@box10 bobg]# getenforce
Permissive
I restarted Firefox. Still the error! Still "No plugins found." I did
not try reboot ...
Well, what did you expect? Did you really think that SELinux was
On 22/07/13 15:57, lists-redhat wrote:
Do you have selinux enabled? My understanding is that if it's
enabled the java plugin won't show for firefox. [I haven't messed
with this myself so don't know specifics.]
- Richard
[root@box10 bobg]# setenforce 0
[root@box10 bobg]# getenforce
Permiss
On 22/07/13 16:00, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:51]:
On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
This is what I have:
[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Jul 22 12:55
/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.s
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:51]:
> On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >This is what I have:
> >
> >[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
> >lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Jul 22 12:55
> >/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 ->
> >/usr/lib64/
On 22.07.2013 21:28, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 22/07/13 14:56, poma wrote:
>> € alternatives --list | grep plugin
>> € alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
>>
>> € ll /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so
>> … /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so ->
>> /etc
On 22/07/13 15:44, Deepak Bhole wrote:
This is what I have:
[root@box10 bobg]# ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 27 Jul 22 12:55
/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 ->
/usr/lib64/IcedTeaPlugin.so
Firefox doesn't seem to recognize it. Should it show up in
* Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA [2013-07-22
15:28]:
> On 22/07/13 14:56, poma wrote:
> >€ alternatives --list | grep plugin
> >€ alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
> >
> >€ ll /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so
> >… /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so ->
> >/etc/al
On 22/07/13 14:56, poma wrote:
€ alternatives --list | grep plugin
€ alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
€ ll /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so
… /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so ->
/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x86_64
€ ll /etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so.x
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> I have two F-19/64 computers with Firefox 22 that want "Java Runtime
> Environment" in order to access http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/crossword/
> and several others. It appears that java openjdk is installed?
The JRE
On 22.07.2013 19:11, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> On 22/07/13 12:44, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> plugin and javaws are in icedtea-web package, so please install it,
>> the page will then work for you :)
>> Also please remove java-1.8.0-openjdk unless you know what you are
>> doing. It is exp
On 22/07/13 12:44, Jiri Vanek wrote:
plugin and javaws are in icedtea-web package, so please install it,
the page will then work for you :)
Also please remove java-1.8.0-openjdk unless you know what you are
doing. It is experimental beta package :)
I did:
root@box10 bobg]# yum install icedtea-
On 07/22/2013 05:32 PM, Bob Goodwin ~ Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
I have two F-19/64 computers with Firefox 22 that want "Java Runtime
Environment" in order to access
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/crossword/ and several others. It appears that
java openjdk is
installed?
[root@box10 bobg]# y
I have two F-19/64 computers with Firefox 22 that want "Java Runtime
Environment" in order to access
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/crossword/ and several others. It
appears that java openjdk is installed?
[root@box10 bobg]# yum install java-1.*-openjdk
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Package 1:
20 matches
Mail list logo
