Hi Matthew,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:15:40AM +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 00:32 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:12:14PM +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > >
> > > I think that's actually no longer a serious issue, as NetworkManager now
> >
On 01/17/2014 09:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
> assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
you could try like this:
ip neigh flush dev
ping -b
ip neigh
HTH,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Descript
On 01/19/2014 06:27 AM, Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote:
On 17 January 2014 20:14, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
[...]
$ nmap -sn 192.168.1.65-150
If you have GNU parallel instead then you can do it in a few seconds:
seq 65 150 | parallel -j0 ping -c1 192.168.1.{} | grep "64 bytes"
Wi
On 17 January 2014 20:14, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> $ nmap -sn 192.168.1.65-150
If you have GNU parallel instead then you can do it in a few seconds:
seq 65 150 | parallel -j0 ping -c1 192.168.1.{} | grep "64 bytes"
Without GNU parallel you can do this:
for f in {65..150}
do
(ping
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 00:32 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Tim, Matthew, others,
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:12:14PM +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 20:42 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 17 Jan
On 01/19/2014 03:52 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 19 January 2014, Suvayu Ali sent:
I had forgotten about this possibility. This works nicely for
wireless using SSIDs, is it possible to do this for wired connections?
After all they do not have something similar to SSID to serve as
iden
Allegedly, on or about 19 January 2014, Suvayu Ali sent:
> I had forgotten about this possibility. This works nicely for
> wireless using SSIDs, is it possible to do this for wired connections?
> After all they do not have something similar to SSID to serve as
> identifier.
There's MAC addresses
On 01/19/2014 03:03 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 02:20:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Double nating may result in strange behaviour, depending on the
application. This should be avoided.
But sometimes cannot be avoided.
I use a router inside my isp router,
as it (isp) is n
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 02:20:06 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Double nating may result in strange behaviour, depending on the
> application. This should be avoided.
>
But sometimes cannot be avoided.
I use a router inside my isp router,
as it (isp) is not enough control,
and they can reset it
On 01/17/2014 02:54 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:42:17 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
My landlord owns the router.
You could connect another router to it and run all your
stuff on a different subnet with a helpful router.
Double nating may result in strange behaviour, depending on
On 01/17/2014 02:42 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
My landlord owns the router. I thi
On 01/17/2014 02:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
$ ip neigh | grep REACHABLE | grep
But this seems rather unrealiable. Often the reported addresse
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:42:17 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> My landlord owns the router.
Another level I know, but can you put a router of your
own, between the landlords router, and your home net.
At least then you control what you see on yours.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users m
Hi Tim, Matthew, others,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:12:14PM +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 20:42 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
> > > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can so
Allegedly, on or about 17 January 2014, Suvayu Ali sent:
> I can't setup my computers to use fixed ip as they are portables and
> leave the house.
Theoretically, you can. You're in the realms of customising something
like NetworkManager, here. Which some people have no troubles with,
while othe
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 20:42 +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
> > Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > > Can someone point me in the right direction?
> >
> > Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
>
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:42:17 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> My landlord owns the router.
You could connect another router to it and run all your
stuff on a different subnet with a helpful router.
> I was under the impression all the ip commands were supposed to be
> replacements for arp, am I wrong?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:26:40PM -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 01:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
> > assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
> >
> > $ ip neigh | grep REACHA
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:27:41PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
>
> > Can someone point me in the right direction?
>
> Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
My landlord owns the router. I think the easiest setup for me would
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 20:14:29 +0100
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Can someone point me in the right direction?
Get a better router that supports DNS as well as DHCP?
Get a better router that allows configuration of
permanent mac <-> ipaddr mapping so you can just
put the names in a hosts file?
I've got a
On 01/17/2014 01:14 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
> assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
>
> $ ip neigh | grep REACHABLE | grep
>
> But this seems rather unrealiable. Often the repor
Hi,
I'm trying to find all my computers on my home network (ip addresses are
assigned using DHCP, can't change that). So far these are my attempts:
$ ip neigh | grep REACHABLE | grep
But this seems rather unrealiable. Often the reported addresses are not
up to date (e.g. offline devices sti
22 matches
Mail list logo
