On 08/19/2015 09:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
or if
you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
message (not to the digest itself). Evolution can d
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
> or if
> > you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
> > message (not to the digest itself). Evolution can do this and I
> think
> > Thunderbird also.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:31:19PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:55 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> > Is there a better way of viewing this list without having to copy
> > paste titles and contents?
>
> Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age),
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 09:55 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> Is there a better way of viewing this list without having to copy
> paste titles and contents?
Don't use digests (they are a waste of time in this day and age), or if
you do then use a mailer that supports direct replying to a digest
messag
Hi,
I recently came up with this 'issue' (not really an issue in fact, please
read along) when I configured a Webmin panel on a CentOS 6.7 instance we
use at work.
Thing is that the sudo tool provides a configuration flag to deny a command
execution if it's not being invoked from a console. Origi
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Scott Mattan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing some disparity between (two distributions granted) CentOS 6.6
> and Fedora22 in their use of the su utility. I cannot figure out the cause,
> so I cannot fix it.
>
> In CentOS there is no way to script login to root...
I have changed my settings from digest.
I will additionally try to add the pam_securetty.so to my su file when I
get home tonight (JST)
Thanks
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/19/15 08:55, Scott Mattan wrote:
> > Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in c
On 08/19/15 08:55, Scott Mattan wrote:
> Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in correctly either...
>
> In anycase, I will explain this after the main issue...
>
> I have the following differences in my /etc/pam.d/su file:
>
> Fedora22:
> #%PAM-1.0
> authsufficient pa
I just tried the non-login-shell with those settings, and it didn't offer
any change from the previous response.
(I primarily work with CentOS6.6 at work but am testing Fedora at home and
would like to implement similar security settings)
[ user@localhost ~]$ su - < password
> echo ""
> id
> EOF
Sorry about the other post, this one may not come in correctly either...
In anycase, I will explain this after the main issue...
I have the following differences in my /etc/pam.d/su file:
Fedora22:
#%PAM-1.0
authsufficient pam_rootok.so
# Uncomment the following line to implicit
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 04:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/19/15 00:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:13 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> > > I havent tried comparing yet but ive verified that disabling
> > > various
> > > combinations on the cent machine does not produce th
On 08/19/15 00:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:13 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
>> I havent tried comparing yet but ive verified that disabling various
>> combinations on the cent machine does not produce the same results.
> Same results as what? Is this part of some other th
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 00:13 +0900, Scott Mattan wrote:
> I havent tried comparing yet but ive verified that disabling various
> combinations on the cent machine does not produce the same results.
Same results as what? Is this part of some other thread?
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedo
I havent tried comparing yet but ive verified that disabling various
combinations on the cent machine does not produce the same results.
I understand that this is not a perfect method and will take a look as soon
as i get home at the very latest by tomorrow JST, and then report back
--
users mail
On 08/18/15 15:09, Scott Mattan wrote:
>
> I am seeing some disparity between (two distributions granted) CentOS 6.6 and
> Fedora22 in their use of the su utility. I cannot figure out the cause, so I
> cannot fix it.
>
> In CentOS there is no way to script login to root... this is of course a
>
Hello,
I am seeing some disparity between (two distributions granted) CentOS 6.6
and Fedora22 in their use of the su utility. I cannot figure out the
cause, so I cannot fix it.
In CentOS there is no way to script login to root... this is of course a
desirable trait.
for instance,
[ user@localhos
16 matches
Mail list logo
