Re: Fedora 31->32 impressions

2020-05-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 4/30/20 7:15 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I then trying "dnf distosync" to make sure I didn't have any leaf packages. To my surprise a BUNCH of packages were listed, mostly modules. I ge that in certain cases modules may be needed but I have *NEVER* intentionally enabled a module version of a pac

Fedora 31->32 impressions

2020-04-30 Thread Richard Shaw
The actual upgrade went fine as usual... The problem was afterwards. I usually do some package cleanup afterwords, there used to be specific programs for this but I'm not sure they're functional anymore so I use "dnf repoquery". Running "dnf repoquery --duplicates" didn't show any significant iss