On 12/27/19 8:07 AM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:38:19AM -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
On 12/27/19 7:15 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
"ip" is your friend. To rename an interface it must be down.
"ip link set enp4s0 down"
"ip link set enp4s0 name eth0"
"ip link set e
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 07:38:19AM -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 12/27/19 7:15 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
> > "ip" is your friend. To rename an interface it must be down.
> >
> > "ip link set enp4s0 down"
> > "ip link set enp4s0 name eth0"
> > "ip link set eth0 up"
When and how can that b
On 12/27/19 7:15 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 12/26/19 5:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/26/19 4:47 PM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The bridge is supposed to bridge enp4s0 (it was being named lan1
prior to the
upgrade to F31) and enp6s1 (was lan2 prior to F31 upgrade).
The messages are for my en
On 12/26/19 5:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 12/26/19 4:47 PM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The bridge is supposed to bridge enp4s0 (it was being named lan1 prior
to the
upgrade to F31) and enp6s1 (was lan2 prior to F31 upgrade).
The messages are for my enp4s0, but it has no IP address. This is v
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 08:19:47PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:47:20 -0800
> Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>
> > or just use enp6s1 and
> > enp4s0 for the bridge and not bother renaming them
>
> Resistance is futile :-). I turn off all the renaming junk
> on systems with just on
On 12/26/19 4:47 PM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The bridge is supposed to bridge enp4s0 (it was being named lan1 prior to the
upgrade to F31) and enp6s1 (was lan2 prior to F31 upgrade).
The messages are for my enp4s0, but it has no IP address. This is via my
iptables setup. I assume this is happen
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:47:20 -0800
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> or just use enp6s1 and
> enp4s0 for the bridge and not bother renaming them
Resistance is futile :-). I turn off all the renaming junk
on systems with just one interface so I can continue to get
eth0, but I gave up on systems with mult
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:19:28AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/26/19 8:42 AM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
> >
> > [umbrella network-scripts]$ more ifcfg-br0
> > DEVICE=br0
> > TYPE=Bridge
> > IPADDR=192.168.1.1
> > NETMASK=255.255.255
On 12/26/19 8:42 AM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
[umbrella network-scripts]$ more ifcfg-br0
DEVICE=br0
TYPE=Bridge
IPADDR=192.168.1.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
It seems odd that there's no default route in that configuration.
Bring up the networ
Hi -
Upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 31, and I'm unable to get my network bridge
working.
Any ideas on how to get this working?
I saw the other posts about adding MACADDR, but I'm not using DHCP and I don't
care
what MAC address is used.
I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
10 matches
Mail list logo