On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, wrote:
>> On 08/13/2011 11:19 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> df ${@} $(findmnt -s| egrep -v
>> '^TARGET|^swap|^/sys|^/proc|^/dev/pts|^/dev/shm' | awk '{ printf("%s ",
>> $1)}')
>
> This does exactly what I need for df. I didn't think the earlier suggest
> On 08/13/2011 11:19 AM, Tom H wrote:
> #!/bin/bash
>
> df ${@} $(findmnt -s| egrep -v
>
'^TARGET|^swap|^/sys|^/proc|^/dev/pts|^/dev/shm' | awk '{ printf("%s
",
> $1)}')
This does exactly what I need
for df. I didn't think the earlier suggestion through.
Probably because I was too annoyed t
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 09:50 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 09:21 AM, Craig White wrote:
> > Some poeple choose to stay a release behind so as to not subject
> > themselves to things are not fully polished - that is their prerogative.
>
> Generally, I keep up with the latest version. Howev
On 08/14/2011 09:21 AM, Craig White wrote:
> Some poeple choose to stay a release behind so as to not subject
> themselves to things are not fully polished - that is their prerogative.
Generally, I keep up with the latest version. However, I'm not an early
adopter because I'd rather that somebod
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 08:20 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 07:04 AM, Tom H wrote:
> > There isn't a single distribution that's released without any bugs.
> > Even RHEL and Debian, supposedly released when everything's OK and
> > without a fixed release date, have bug fixes published almost
On 08/14/2011 07:04 AM, Tom H wrote:
> There isn't a single distribution that's released without any bugs.
> Even RHEL and Debian, supposedly released when everything's OK and
> without a fixed release date, have bug fixes published almost
> immediately post-release.
On a side note, I was explaini
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 13.08.2011 17:19, schrieb Tom H:
>>
>> So anyone/anything with whom/which you don't agree is dumb, silly, ...
>
> no but it shows that all arguments "if we break applications we fix it"
> is simply not true because in the reality this end
Am 13.08.2011 17:19, schrieb Tom H:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Reindl Harald
> wrote:
>> this thread is about a idiotic change in the behavior of mount
>> shortly before release F15 and i do not speak only about locate
>>
>> COREUTILS have to be fixed that there output is the same
>> a
On 08/13/2011 11:19 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> So anyone/anything with whom/which you don't agree is dumb, silly, ...
Something like this for df may work until df is "fixed" (this is all 1
line of course)
cat mydf
#!/bin/bash
df ${@} $(findmnt -s| egrep -v
'^TARGET|^swap|^/sys|^/proc|^/dev/pts|^/
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> this thread is about a idiotic change in the behavior of mount
> shortly before release F15 and i do not speak only about locate
>
> COREUTILS have to be fixed that there output is the same
> as before the change or such a change has to be
Am 12.08.2011 16:34, schrieb Tom H:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 12.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Tom H:
Seems this is a known *feature* of F-15 and no one is all that interested
in
changing it. Unfortunately, I have a good number of scripts that u
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 12.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Tom H:
>>>
>>> Seems this is a known *feature* of F-15 and no one is all that interested in
>>> changing it. Unfortunately, I have a good number of scripts that use the
>>> output of df and mount that would need
Am 12.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Tom H:
>> Seems this is a known *feature* of F-15 and no one is all that interested in
>> changing it. Unfortunately, I have a good number of scripts that use the
>> output of df and mount that would need modified for this. The /var/tmp
>> mount is especially troub
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:10 PM, wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't define
>>> in
>>> the install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
>>> the
>>> duplication? A quick Google search sugge
On 08/11/2011 04:10 PM, arag...@dcsnow.com wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't define
>>> in
>>> the install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
>>> the
>>> duplication? A quick Google sear
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM,
wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I found that I have multiple
mount points that I didn't define
>> in
>> the
install and are not in fstab. Is there an easy way to get rid of
>> the
>> duplication? A quick Google search
suggested disabling sandbox but I
>
> take a look
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:49 PM, wrote:
>
> I just installed Fedora 15 for the first time on a new box. Man... The
> change in device names alone is going to cause me lots of headaches. So
> many scripts, so little time...
>
> Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't def
Hello all,
I just installed Fedora 15 for the first time on a
new box. Man... The change in device names alone is going to
cause me lots of headaches. So many scripts, so little time...
Anyway, I found that I have multiple mount points that I didn't
define in the install and are not in fstab
18 matches
Mail list logo
