On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 15:54 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Brian
> Works for me also :) The question arises, what has changed with the
> 2.6.32 kernel (the kernel update that I JUST installed has the same
> issue) that causes this issue?
That is a very good question. They only way I fou
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 03:30 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> > Hello Everyone
> > The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain
that
> > I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
> >
> > Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
> > kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:19:52 -0600
Rick Sewill wrote:
> Questions please:
> 1) Are there 3 drivers, nvidia, nv, nouveau?
Yes.
> 2) If there are 3 drivers, how did people decide which driver to use?
The Fedora default is 'nouveau'.
>My questions on this subject, are as follows:
>a) I
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:19 -0600, John Thompson wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 03:32 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
>
> > If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia
> > driver,
> > please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest
> > possible way. �
On 03/08/2010 03:32 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
> If all I need to do is try running without the proprietary NVidia
> driver,
> please let me know specifically how to disable that driver the easiest
> possible way. �Translation: so that I can just boot back into an older
> kernel
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 03:30 -0600, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
>
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64. When
On 03/08/2010 09:30 AM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
>
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64. When I attempted
On 8 March 2010 09:30, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that
> I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
>
> Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
> kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64. When I attempted t
Hello Everyone
The good news is that in my 10+ years using Linux, I am almost certain that
I have never had a kernel that would not boot...
Last night I ran "yum update" and it pulled in
kernel-2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64. When I attempted to boot it, the boot
process seemed to complete, but X nev
