On 17 December 2013 20:43, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 12:32 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> People with the time, resources and
>> inclination are more than welcome to run beta.
>
> And, as far as running beta goes, I have the time and the resources, but not
> the inclination.
Yes, I was trying
On 17 December 2013 20:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> On 12/17/2013 11:57 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> Joe, if I must justify my actions, and I question that, there's no "big
>>> rush" it's just another form of amusement for me.
>>
>> No, you don't nee
On 12/17/2013 12:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Fedora doesn't magically get more stable. It's due to testing, bug reporting,
and triaging those bugs, much of which is done by volunteers. The more testers,
the better the coverage, the more bugs are found before release. The stability
depends in la
On 17/12/13 14:22, Chris Murphy wrote:
Check commonbugs, in particular this one pertaining to pre-release installation
/root permissions:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#.2Froot_permissions_incorrect_on_pre-release_installations
Chris Murphy
Ok, I changed the permissions as sugg
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it?
yum or dnf update it.
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 17/12/13 13:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0500
>> Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>
>>> What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it? It was
>>> updated early this morning an
On 12/17/2013 10:48 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
As I said I updated it around 04:00 this morning before the official
release time so it would seem it whould be updated to the max.
Why be in such a hurry to upgrade? Is being an early adopter that
important to you? On the first day or so of a new
On 17/12/13 13:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it? It was
updated early this morning and I suspect it is now the equivalent of
the new release.
You will need to do a 'yum distro-sync&#
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it? It was
> updated early this morning and I suspect it is now the equivalent of
> the new release.
>
> Will I have problems with yum updates?
>
> Presently
What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it? It was updated
early this morning and I suspect it is now the equivalent of the new
release.
Will I have problems with yum updates?
Presently it shows: [bobg@box10 ~]$ uname -a
Linux box10 3.11.10-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Nov 29 19:16
On 17/12/13 13:40, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:38:49 -0500
Bob Goodwin wrote:
What do I do with a Fedora-20 beta install to update it?
yum or dnf update it.
[root@box10 bobg]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
No packages marked for update
So I can
On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> And, as far as running beta goes, I have the time and the resources, but not
> the inclination. Cleaning up after an upgrade hung, or otherwise failed so
> that I don't have to do a complete re-install and figure out what packages I
> forgot t
On 12/17/2013 12:32 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
In fact by definition it's people running pre-release for whatever
reason who are doing the testing! And even if you don't want, or don't
think you're wanted, to fill out test matrices, you can still provide
feedback on individual packages. People with th
On 17/12/13 14:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
Why be in such a hurry to upgrade? Is being an early adopter that
important to you? On the first day or so of a new release, the repos
are going to be slammed, just as the MS servers are on Patch Tuesday.
And, of course, there's always the few (we hope) bugs
On 12/17/2013 11:57 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Joe, if I must justify my actions, and I question that, there's no "big
rush" it's just another form of amusement for me.
No, you don't need to justify your actions; if you find it amusing to be
an early adopter and deal with all of the last-minute oo
On 17 December 2013 19:57, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 17/12/13 14:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>> Why be in such a hurry to upgrade? Is being an early adopter that
>> important to you? On the first day or so of a new release, the repos are
>> going to be slammed, just as the MS servers are on Patch Tuesd
On Dec 17, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/17/2013 11:57 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> Joe, if I must justify my actions, and I question that, there's no "big
>> rush" it's just another form of amusement for me.
>
> No, you don't need to justify your actions; if you find it amusing to be
17 matches
Mail list logo
