Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread CLOSE Dave
Chris Murphy wrote: > We'd need to look at LBA 0 on a broken system to do an autopsy. Once > it's fixed, the evidence of what stepped on it is wiped away. I have two more systems to upgrade, probably next week. If one of them fails in the same way, I'll capture the MBR and post here. --

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 4:00 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > I'm pretty sure (been a while since I checked) that neither the > bootloader nor kernel care if the primary GPT header or table fail > checksum verification, they just use it in the blind anyway. No > fallback to the backup. And no fail. That

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:36 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 5/30/19 10:06 AM, CLOSE Dave wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > > >> Not sure what would corrupt it but there is competition for LBA 0, > >> the MBR, in that there's a bootloader portion in the first ~440 bytes > >> and then a partition ta

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:07 AM CLOSE Dave wrote: > > Chris Murphy wrote: > > > Not sure what would corrupt it but there is competition for LBA 0, > > the MBR, in that there's a bootloader portion in the first ~440 bytes > > and then a partition table from that point until the 512th byte. So > >

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/30/19 10:06 AM, CLOSE Dave wrote: Chris Murphy wrote: Not sure what would corrupt it but there is competition for LBA 0, the MBR, in that there's a bootloader portion in the first ~440 bytes and then a partition table from that point until the 512th byte. So whenever something changes a pa

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-30 Thread CLOSE Dave
Chris Murphy wrote: > Not sure what would corrupt it but there is competition for LBA 0, > the MBR, in that there's a bootloader portion in the first ~440 bytes > and then a partition table from that point until the 512th byte. So > whenever something changes a partition or a boot flag (active bi

Re: F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-29 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:01 PM CLOSE Dave wrote: > > I have upgraded three VMware images previously running Fedora 29 to > Fedora 30 using system-upgrade. All the images are running on the same > ESC hardware and, so far as I know, use the same VMware foundation. The > first worked flawlessly. Bo

F29 to F30 VMware upgrade

2019-05-29 Thread CLOSE Dave
I have upgraded three VMware images previously running Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 using system-upgrade. All the images are running on the same ESC hardware and, so far as I know, use the same VMware foundation. The first worked flawlessly. Both the second and third failed in exactly the same way: they