On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 00:03:46 +0100,
Aaron Gray wrote:
> Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this if it
> is true ?
Because of Fedora's short life cycle there is a lot more work to maintain
than some other Linux distros.
> Surely with SELinux its going to be mo
On 2 April 2011 00:24, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 06:03 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this
> > if it is true ?
> >
> > Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance,
> >
>
On 04/01/2011 06:03 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this
> if it is true ?
>
> Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Aaron
>
As has been said, if you're going to do a produc
On 04/01/2011 07:03 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this
> if it is true ?
>
> Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Aaron
Applications are *far* lest tested before being all
You need to remember that Fedora release has a short life cycle, different
of rhel, centos, sl, that has a long life cycle.
- -
iarlyy selbir
:wq!
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this if
> it is true ?
>
> S
Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this if it
is true ?
Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ?
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://ad