On 02/26/2010 03:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Tony Nelson wrote:
On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
...
I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol
would interact t
On 02/26/2010 03:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Tony Nelson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
...
> I can't conceive of a situation
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Tony Nelson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol
would interact to "smack" an im
On 02/25/2010 09:34 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Tony Nelson wrote:
>
>> On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> ...
>>
>>
>>> I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol
>>> would interact to "smack" an imap connection.
>>>
>>> To me, based on your observations, I
Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
> ...
>
>> I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol
>> would interact to "smack" an imap connection.
>>
>> To me, based on your observations, I'm getting the feeling you may
>> have a strange network problem
On 10-02-25 21:37:58, Ed Greshko wrote:
...
> I can't conceive of a situation where usage of http or ftp protocol
> would interact to "smack" an imap connection.
>
> To me, based on your observations, I'm getting the feeling you may
> have a strange network problem that may be local to you or wit
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 05:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Yes. I tried it with and without. Problems are the same. Seems to
me it is a yum problem, b
On 02/25/2010 05:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Yes. I tried it with and without. Problems are the same. Seems to
>>> me it is a yum problem, but I am speculating. I am running FF. sendmail,
>>> DNS,
Steven Stern wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 07:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>
>> You could try removing /var/cache/yum/timedhosts.txt and then enabling
>> fastestmirror again. I did that when I was troubleshooting when I found
>> the problem with Singapore. FWIW, Singapore had been working just
>> fine.
On 02/25/2010 07:57 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>> On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yes. I tried it with and without. Problems are the same. Seems to
>>> me it is a yum problem, but I am speculating. I am running FF. sendmail,
>>> DNS, etc.. a
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes. I tried it with and without. Problems are the same. Seems to
>> me it is a yum problem, but I am speculating. I am running FF. sendmail,
>> DNS, etc.. a LOT of services and I am not seeing any problems.
On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 03:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Seems to me, that Yum is per
On 02/25/2010 03:58 PM, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 03:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>
>>>
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
> badly. I often get ne
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> OK, I believe I understand your question a bit better.
>>
>> Since you are able to use firefox, for example, without problem it
>> doesn't appear you have a true network issue. Or, at least, it isn't
>> local to you. If firefox were also giving you grief it would be
On 02/25/2010 03:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
badly. I often get network disconnects and Yum
keeps spinnin
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
>>> badly. I often get network disconnects and Yum
>>> keeps spinning after going into 0.0b transfer rates
>>> forever and requires a f
On 02/25/2010 03:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
>> badly. I often get network disconnects and Yum
>> keeps spinning after going into 0.0b transfer rates
>> forever and requires a forced kill.
>>
>>
> Ahhh If you are
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
> badly. I often get network disconnects and Yum
> keeps spinning after going into 0.0b transfer rates
> forever and requires a forced kill.
>
Ahhh If you are getting network disconnects then any application
yum, firefox,
Seems to me, that Yum is performing quite
badly. I often get network disconnects and Yum
keeps spinning after going into 0.0b transfer rates
forever and requires a forced kill.
Anyone see this problem?
I am of course using NetworkManager, and wonder
if I should use the old-network connectivity
19 matches
Mail list logo
