Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > I suspect it's merely a label and application-specific. The moment you > > email someone without the requisite software it's going to get ignored. Stephen Morris: > Organisations, if they so desire, can put processes in place to > handle mails with headers specifying sensitivity differen

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as > "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail > headers, and conversely, when an email comes in with mail headers > specifying a sensitivity level does Evo

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:28 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On a whim, I picked "unclassified" for this reply, to see what it does, > and if it makes it through the list server. I see it does. It added a header "Security: Unclassified". But for you to know anything about this while reading your ma

Evolution Functionality

Hi,     I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a mail package.     Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail headers, and conversely, when an email comes in with mail headers specifying a sensitivity

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:22 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 3/20/25 2:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > > *From:* Samuel Sieb > > > > *Sent:* Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 09:49 UTC+11 > > > > *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > *Subject:* RE: Evo

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Hi, >     I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a mail package. You might want to ask on the Evolution mailing list. See https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-users There's also a Gnome Discourse forum at h

Re: Evolution Functionality

so I'm not sure yet > what they mean, and the admins are ignoring those messages, hence I'm > trying to send a sensitive mail from home to see what happens with > that, which is why I'm looking at Evolution functionality Well, there's more than one header that can be used

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 09:15 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > With sensitive mails in Outlook, if you forward the mail Outlook > retains the mail headers in the forwarded mail and honours the > headers. I'd expect that. Forward generally means pass it along as-it-is (that's if you pass it along as a

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Tim via users *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 March 2025 at 12:38 UTC+11 *To:* Community support for Fedora users *Cc:* Tim *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: If a mail header specifies a sensitivity level, when the mail is read

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Tim via users *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 March 2025 at 12:57 UTC+11 *To:* Community support for Fedora users *Cc:* Tim *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Thunderbird running locally on my machine will auto configure the

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 12:01 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:24 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Thunderbird is similar in that for mails I receive from this list the > > "Reply All" button is replaced by "Reply List", and if by mistake I > > press "Reply" it expectedly breaks

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Thunderbird running locally on my machine will auto configure the > mail servers when I supply the email address for the account I want > to define in Thunderbird, so I was querying if Evolution can do the > same thing? regards, Steve Ther

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:24 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > Thunderbird is similar in that for mails I receive from this list the > "Reply All" button is replaced by "Reply List", and if by mistake I > press "Reply" it expectedly breaks the chain. regards, Steve Evolution has noticed a mailing-list

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:19 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > If a mail header specifies a sensitivity level, when the mail is read > in Outlook it adds a message above the subject to treat the mail as > whatever sensitivity is specified (except if there is no sensitivity, > in which case the sensitiv

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > It was a ridiculous palaver just to find a way to send a new email to a > > person without it being a reply, for instance. Patrick O'Callaghan: > Clicking on the address works. It hid them... I had a series of separate emails I've sent someone, who responded outside of email, so they're

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Tim via users *Sent:* Sunday, 23 March 2025 at 02:06 UTC+11 *To:* Community support for Fedora users *Cc:* Tim *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality Tim: I remember in my early days of the internet, Outlook Express was widely despised for breaking threading by not including the

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Patrick O'Callaghan *Sent:* Saturday, 22 March 2025 at 03:59 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 01:00 +1030, Tim via users wrote: I remember in my early days of the internet, Outlook Express was widely des

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Jeffrey Walton *Sent:* Friday, 21 March 2025 at 10:34 UTC+11 *To:* Community support for Fedora users *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:22 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/20/25 2:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: *From:* Samuel Sieb *Sent:* Thursday, 20

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Tim via users *Sent:* Saturday, 22 March 2025 at 01:40 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Cc:* Tim *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:56 +1030, Tim via users wrote: The actual headers you can insert into messags seems to be controlled from

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Samuel Sieb *Sent:* Friday, 21 March 2025 at 09:20 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On 3/20/25 2:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: *From:* Samuel Sieb *Sent:* Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 09:49 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 11:30 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > > > I'm beginning to wonder how many people actually use a mail program > > > instead of a webmail interface these days. > > Patrick O'Callaghan: > > Outside of mailing lists such as this one, probably not that many, and > > those ar

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Samuel Sieb *Sent:* Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 09:49 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On 3/19/25 3:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a mail package. Does Evolution

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > I'm beginning to wonder how many people actually use a mail program > > instead of a webmail interface these days. Patrick O'Callaghan: > Outside of mailing lists such as this one, probably not that many, and > those are dominated by the corporate use of Outlook, which is why > Evolution

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Sun, 2025-03-23 at 01:36 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > Tim: > > > I remember in my early days of the internet, Outlook Express was widely > > > despised for breaking threading by not including the necessary headers > > > in the replies to maintain the chain. It just, VERY DUMBLY, grouped > > >

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > I remember in my early days of the internet, Outlook Express was widely > > despised for breaking threading by not including the necessary headers > > in the replies to maintain the chain. It just, VERY DUMBLY, grouped > > messages with same subject, but didn't thread replies with their p

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 01:00 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > I remember in my early days of the internet, Outlook Express was widely > despised for breaking threading by not including the necessary headers > in the replies to maintain the chain.  It just, VERY DUMBLY, grouped > messages with same subj

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:56 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > The actual headers you can insert into messags seems to be controlled > from: > > /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/org.gnome.evolution.plugin.email-custom-header.gschema.xml > > > >id="org.gnome.evolution.plugin.email-custom-header" > ge

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > However, if I reply to such a classified (of some kind) message, the > > reply will not have the security header unless I deliberately add one > > while replying. And you'd be unaware of this when replying. > > > > C minus, needs more thought. Jeffrey Walton: > Not copying previous head

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 2:43 AM Tim via users wrote: > > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:26 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > > On a whim, I picked "unclassified" for this reply, to see what it does, > > and if it makes it through the list server. > > It came through the list with the header. > > However, if

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:26 +1030, Tim via users wrote: > On a whim, I picked "unclassified" for this reply, to see what it does, > and if it makes it through the list server. It came through the list with the header. However, if I reply to such a classified (of some kind) message, the reply will

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 09:08 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > When sensitivity levels are set on a mail, the mail client adds > headers into the header list to specify the sensitivity level > specified (Private, confidential, organisation-confidential). The > setting of organisation-confidential is th

RE: Evolution Functionality

*From:* Tim via users *Sent:* Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 15:08 UTC+11 *To:* noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users *Cc:* Tim *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality Tim: I don't actually know what you mean by organisation-sensitive or sensitivity level, I can

Re: Evolution Functionality

On 3/20/25 2:53 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: *From:* Samuel Sieb *Sent:* Thursday, 20 March 2025 at 09:49 UTC+11 *To:* users@lists.fedoraproject.org *Subject:* RE: Evolution Functionality On 3/19/25 3:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a

Re: Evolution Functionality

Tim: > > I don't actually know what you mean by organisation-sensitive or > > sensitivity level, I can only guess. Jeffrey Walton: > . Yes, I mentioned classifications further below in my email. The organisation-sensitiv

Re: Evolution Functionality

On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:21 PM Tim via users wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as > > "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail > > headers, and conversely, when an email comes

Re: Evolution Functionality

On 3/19/25 3:11 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:     I have a query about the functionality of Evolution as a mail package.     Does Evolution support the tagging of outgoing mails as "organisation-sensitive" and hence generate the appropriate mail headers, and conversely, when an email comes in wi