On 15/12/2021 00:43, old sixpack13 wrote:
On 12/13/21 20:58, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't think the objection was to that reply. It was to a very
sarcastic one that followed it.
Riki
You need to be a bit more careful about attribution.
Although the statement is signed by "Riki" you have "Sam
> On 12/13/21 20:58, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> I don't think the objection was to that reply. It was to a very
> sarcastic one that followed it.
>
> Riki
if me is meant:
from me came *no* sarcasm against Samuel.
the opposite is true: he declared that I could be wrong and maybe I am.
but maybe I'm
On 12/13/21 20:58, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/13/21 17:49, old sixpack13 wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:36:00PM -, old sixpack13 wrote:
Please do not call people's ideas "brain damaged" in Fedora spaces.
This is
not okay.
not okay: full Agreed
to me it's slightly something more then ju
> On 12/13/21 17:49, old sixpack13 wrote:
>
> Maybe you need to re-read the original email instead of assuming bad intent.
>
thanks for support
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fed
On 12/13/21 17:49, old sixpack13 wrote:
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:36:00PM -, old sixpack13 wrote:
Please do not call people's ideas "brain damaged" in Fedora spaces. This is
not okay.
not okay: full Agreed
to me it's slightly something more then just "ideas"
I get very very upset reading
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:36:00PM -, old sixpack13 wrote:
>
> Please do not call people's ideas "brain damaged" in Fedora spaces. This is
> not okay.
>
not okay: full Agreed
to me it's slightly something more then just "ideas"
I get very very upset reading again and again on a "user list"
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 05:36:00PM -, old sixpack13 wrote:
> therefore we exactly have *you* to move them, and of course "fedora
> users" too, off that lists, because they don't fit into ${poc's brain
> damaged sort and regulation scheme}
Please do not call people's ideas "brain damaged" in F
