On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 14:46:48 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> Without SNI, there would only be one website on an IP and you could
> get the hostname from the certificate anyway. So it doesn't really
> make any difference privacy-wise.
another great reason to go to IPV6
d
--
In modern fantasy (lit
On 2/22/19 10:15 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Samuel Sieb:
This hasn't been true for a long time. I don't remember the
acronym, but you can have an unlimited number of website hostnames on
the same IP address that all have their own unique certificates.
"SNI"? RFC'd in 2003, and still not suppor
Tim:
>> If the numerical IP address of your service is shared between
>> yourselves and others, whether that's because your IP can change at
>> different logins, or other's use it simultaneously (such as
>> webserver hosts that service many clients on the same numerical
>> IP), you're not going to
On 2/22/19 7:10 AM, Tim via users wrote:
If the numerical IP address of your service is shared between
yourselves and others, whether that's because your IP can change at
different logins, or other's use it simultaneously (such as webserver
hosts that service many clients on the same numerical I
Allegedly, on or about 20 February 2019, William Oliver sent:
> The gist I got was that my domain resolved correctly, and the ICANN
> ownership info of the domain was correct, but the ownership of the
> some other component, like the IP address, was different, since it
> was tied to my ISP and not
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 13:09 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> [snip]
> You didn't have a dns delegation-of-authority which allows you to
> claim
> control or the mail server's reverse dns address and showing you're
> not
> some fly-by-night spammer or some such.
>
> If your were to dig for the PTR rec
On 2/20/19 9:57 AM, William Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, S. Bob wrote:
Hi All;
This is probably Off Topic, apologies...
I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that
does
not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We
are
using our
On 2/20/19 10:57 AM, William Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, S. Bob wrote:
Hi All;
This is probably Off Topic, apologies...
I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that
does
not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We
are
using o
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, S. Bob wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> This is probably Off Topic, apologies...
>
>
> I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that
> does
> not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We
> are
> using our own domain which I was
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, S. Bob wrote:
> They can email me at other addresses but
> not the 'migrated' address. I'm not sure how to even start debugging this...
[Definitely OT, but anyway ...]
Do they get an error message back? Is their mail being dumped by a spam
filter? Does Fastmai
Hi All;
This is probably Off Topic, apologies...
I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that does
not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We are
using our own domain which I was also doing with google.
All of our clients can now email me at th
11 matches
Mail list logo
