On 06/23/2015 12:36 AM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Dan,
> Thanks a lot for your reply.
> In fact, I ran
> pm -e selinux-policy-targeted
> rpm -e selinux-policy
> And after reboot I got some message about freeze from systemd, I could
> not login (tried twice), so I reinstalled Linux on this machine.
>
Hi,
One of the reasons I'm using Fedora is because the exceptional support for
SELinux and auditd that so far - despite a known incompatibility with
Docker + Btrfs - is working great.
Said that, kudos to everyone who makes SELinux integration such smooth.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:36 AM Kevin Wi
Dan,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
In fact, I ran
pm -e selinux-policy-targeted
rpm -e selinux-policy
And after reboot I got some message about freeze from systemd, I could
not login (tried twice), so I reinstalled Linux on this machine.
The question is: what do you mean by "If you disable SELinux".
Hi Daniel,
On 22 June 2015 at 15:41, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 03:44 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>>> In /etc/selinux/config
>>>
>>> I set
>>> SELINUX=disabled
>>> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to m
On 06/22/2015 03:44 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>> In /etc/selinux/config
>>
>> I set
>> SELINUX=disabled
>> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to me.
> It is recommended to keep it permissive instead of disabled.
>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:01:41AM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
>
> In /etc/selinux/config
>
> I set
> SELINUX=disabled
> Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to me.
It is recommended to keep it permissive instead of disabled.
> So will it be OK to run:
> rpm -e selinux-poli
Hi,
Thanks Sam, Tom and Ranjan!
Going further:
In /etc/selinux/config
I set
SELINUX=disabled
Which means that I do not use in fact SElinux, so it seems to me.
So will it be OK to run:
rpm -e selinux-policy-targeted
rpm -e selinux-policy
Regards,
Kevin
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Ranjan
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:19:15 -0400 Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:14:56 -0400
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> > My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
> > spammer, and won't be missed.
>
> There are a few obscure questions you can answer about you
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 19:14:56 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
> spammer, and won't be missed.
There are a few obscure questions you can answer about your
system using auditd, but it is almost impossible to discover
how to
Kevin Wilson writes:
Hi all,
Will I miss something critical if I will disable auditd on Fedora 22
by "systemctl disable auditd" ?
My totally unscientific assessment of auditd is that it's a massive syslog
spammer, and won't be missed.
pgp96k7vv5BE7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
user
Hi all,
Will I miss something critical if I will disable auditd on Fedora 22
by "systemctl disable auditd" ?
Regards,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Con
11 matches
Mail list logo