On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 06:29 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> For your netopia problem, have you seen:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505105#c48
>
> No, but I'll look into that.
>
>> For your last update to your bug report, you chose the wrong d
On 01/06/2011 06:29 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
> For your netopia problem, have you seen:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505105#c48
No, but I'll look into that.
> For your last update to your bug report, you chose the wrong dig
> output since google.com doesn't have an ipv6 address and the
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 11:34 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>>
>> So if that proves that the glibc bug you suspected is indeed there,
>> Gordon, what's the next step for us to take?
>
> I've added information to the bug (which I originally filed). You can
>
On 01/04/2011 11:34 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>
> So if that proves that the glibc bug you suspected is indeed there,
> Gordon, what's the next step for us to take?
I've added information to the bug (which I originally filed). You can
add yourself to the CC list if you have an account. I looked a
On 01/04/2011 11:34 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> Oh, I understood that message meant that the DNS server wouldn't enquire
> of other servers automatically if it didn't know the IP address of the
> domain.
Doesn't that break DNS resolution? How does the server know what to
report if it never goes af
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:20 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 03:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> > OK, here are the results of making IPv6 type DNS requests.
> >
> > --
> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my l
On 01/02/2011 05:20 AM, Tom H wrote:
> google.com doesn't have an ipv6 address so your test is incorrect,
The test was correct. I wasn't looking for a result, I was looking for
an indication that the DNS server would do recursive queries for
records. The hostname could have been anything.
On 01/02/2011 04:10 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>
>> All this leaves me with one question: is there a way of turning off
>> these IPv6 DNS requests in Fedora?
>
> Disable ipv6.
As far as I know, glibc will issue queries whether IPv6 is
configured o
On 01/02/2011 03:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> OK, here are the results of making IPv6 type DNS requests.
>
> --
> Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
>
> ;<<>> DiG 9.7.2-P2-RedHat-9.7.2-2.P2.fc14<<>>
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>
> OK, here are the results of the tests Tom proposed:
>
> dig @8.8.8.8 -t google.com
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 40250
> ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> dig @8.8.8.8 -t i
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 08:20 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 07:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> >>
> >> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
> >> >
> >> > So
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 08:20 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 07:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> >>
> >> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
> >> >
> >> > So
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 07:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>>
>> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
>> >
>> > So the "no response" I guess means IPv6 is not supported by the s
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 12:27 +, Dick Holland wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 07:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
> > >
> > > So the "no response" I guess means IPv6 is not supp
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 07:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>
>
> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
> >
> > So the "no response" I guess means IPv6 is not supported by the server.
> >
> > Sending "dig -t google.com" to my I
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> Sending "dig -t google.com" to my local DNS server:
>
> So the "no response" I guess means IPv6 is not supported by the server.
>
> Sending "dig -t google.com" to my ISP's DNS servers:
>
> No answer from the ISP either! So I guess t
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 08:45 +, Dick Holland wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 00:33 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 01/01/2011 05:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> > > I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> > > DNS is not working properly.
> > ...
> > > I've traw
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 00:33 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/01/2011 05:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> > I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> > DNS is not working properly.
> ...
> > I've trawled the forums and mailing list archives and I've searched
> > Redh
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 12:59 -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 16:51 +, Dick Holland wrote:
> > Doc, here's /etc/nsswitch.conf:
> >
> > #
> > # /etc/nsswitch.conf
> > #
> > # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be
> > # sorted with the most-u
On 01/01/2011 05:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> DNS is not working properly.
...
> I've trawled the forums and mailing list archives and I've searched
> Redhat bugzilla. I've seen references to 64-bit DNS problems in F10-F11,
>
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 16:51 +, Dick Holland wrote:
> Doc, here's /etc/nsswitch.conf:
>
> #
> # /etc/nsswitch.conf
> #
> # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be
> # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning.
> #
> # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that t
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 11:26 -0500, Darton Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Darton Williams wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> >> I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> >> DNS is not working properly.
> >>
> >
> >
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 08:10 -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 08:08 -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > Dick,
> >
> > What does your /etc/nsswitch.conf 'host:' line say?
>
> Oops. Make that 'hosts:'
>
> --Doc
>
Doc, here's /etc/nsswitch.conf:
#
# /etc/nsswitch
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Darton Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
>> I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
>> DNS is not working properly.
>>
>
> Just a hunch, but check your settings in both system-config-network in
>
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Dick Holland wrote:
> I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> DNS is not working properly.
>
Just a hunch, but check your settings in both system-config-network in
(System -> Administration -> Network) and NetworkManager (System ->
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 08:08 -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> Dick,
>
> What does your /etc/nsswitch.conf 'host:' line say?
Oops. Make that 'hosts:'
--Doc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 13:59 +, Dick Holland wrote:
> I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
> DNS is not working properly.
>
> nslookup and dig can both find google.com quite successfully, but any
> other method of trying to connect to remote site (http, teln
I've installed F14 on a box that was running F8 (I know, I know...) and
DNS is not working properly.
nslookup and dig can both find google.com quite successfully, but any
other method of trying to connect to remote site (http, telnet, ftp) all
fail with the same error that they cannot resolve the
28 matches
Mail list logo
