Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-04-01 Thread Bear Tooth
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:36:37 -0700, CLOSE Dave wrote: > That is, it works but it takes an unreasonably long time to do so. How > can it be that, DNF knows the package is already installed and /still/ > takes such a long time to decide that dependencies are ok? There aren't > any dependencies to re

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread stan
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:15:03 + Chris Murphy wrote: > The more recent one bugging me is downloading those metadata files 2-3 > times per day even after clean all (once right after is expected, but > again 4 hours later no.) Put this line in your /etc/dnf/dnf.conf file to get a delay of 12 ho

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:53:01AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I am expecting Red Hat to finally take consequence on dnf and to > stop shipping broken banana SW, such as dnf Seriously, Ralf — this is not constructive. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "CLOSE Dave" > > Several folks have responded that they don't see the same behavior I do. > I don't doubt that. Even for me, the behavior is erratic, sometimes very > slow, sometimes not. The resolution is fast, it can delay because of some expensive plugin hook call. Can you try this:

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/30/2016 09:11 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: On 30. 3. 2016 at 06:35:19, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/29/2016 07:36 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already installed, DNF gives a response like the following. Last metadata expiration check performed

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread Chris Murphy
> > > I suggest using strace to find out where the delay is happening. I found a bug where wonky mirrors were responsible for the hang, and made some adjustments to dnf to make it decidedly less tolerant of such mirrors. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294953 The more recent one bugg

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Zelený
On 30. 3. 2016 at 06:35:19, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/29/2016 07:36 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: > > If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already > > installed, DNF gives a response like the following. > > > > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... > > Pack

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/29/2016 07:36 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote: If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already installed, DNF gives a response like the following. Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... Package is already installed, skipping. ... (long delay, sometimes

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread stan
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:36:37 -0700 CLOSE Dave wrote: > If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already > installed, DNF gives a response like the following. > > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... > Package is already installed, skipping. > ...

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread CLOSE Dave
Several folks have responded that they don't see the same behavior I do. I don't doubt that. Even for me, the behavior is erratic, sometimes very slow, sometimes not. The specific instance which prompted my note was an attempt to install from a local RPM file, not even from a repository. The ma

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:16:00PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/29/2016 12:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >I can't replicate this: > Neither can I, and the metadata is 3 days, 14:22:13 hours old. > Possibly dnf has been configured to get new metadata every time, > because it looks like it was las

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Rick Stevens
On 03/29/2016 12:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:36:37AM -0700, CLOSE Dave wrote: If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already installed, DNF gives a response like the following. Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... Package xx

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Joe Zeff
On 03/29/2016 12:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: I can't replicate this: Neither can I, and the metadata is 3 days, 14:22:13 hours old. Possibly dnf has been configured to get new metadata every time, because it looks like it was last refreshed 2 seconds ago. -- users mailing list users@lists.

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Mark Haney
I can't either: [markh@aurelian ~]$ time sudo dnf install firefox Last metadata expiration check: 1:27:25 ago on Tue Mar 29 13:44:11 2016. Package firefox-45.0.1-2.fc23.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! real0m2.087s user0m1.914s sys

Re: DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:36:37AM -0700, CLOSE Dave wrote: > If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already > installed, DNF gives a response like the following. > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... > Package is already installed, skipping. > .

DNF is a time waster

2016-03-29 Thread CLOSE Dave
If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already installed, DNF gives a response like the following. Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ... Package is already installed, skipping. ... (long delay, sometimes several minutes) ... Dependencies resolved.