Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:29:03 -0400, Genes wrote: > (2) encryption > Both support gpg - > TB additionally supports s/mime certs (cannot find it in claws - > anywone know for sure - tho I imagine it is there?) > > If you're communicating with any .mil (or someone who uses this

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote: > I generally avoid it, but sometimes I do use html formatted emails. > Like when I need to send a long weblink and I know the recipient isn't > very computer literate. > > Does claws have an html email editor for composing such an email ? As far

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Linuxguy123
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:29 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: > (1) Structured email. > > If you receive (or send) structured email - > bullet lists, tables, highlights etc ... you may prefer > something which supports structure (like thunderbird, evolution). > > If you seldom re

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Genes MailLists
On 04/04/2011 03:53 PM, Piscium wrote: > On 4 April 2011 20:44, Linuxguy123 wrote: > >> This is why I ask questions that have seemingly simple answers on this >> board. So much knowledge and experience and everyone does things a bit >> differently. > > I had never heard of Claws before. I am cu

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Piscium wrote: > On 4 April 2011 20:44, Linuxguy123 wrote: > >> This is why I ask questions that have seemingly simple answers on this >> board.  So much knowledge and experience and everyone does things a bit >> differently. > > I had never heard of Claws before.

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Piscium
On 4 April 2011 20:44, Linuxguy123 wrote: > This is why I ask questions that have seemingly simple answers on this > board.  So much knowledge and experience and everyone does things a bit > differently. I had never heard of Claws before. I am currently using Thunderbird. How does Claws compare

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Linuxguy123
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:28 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > I don't use claws filtering though, I run a local dovecot > server (so I can do things like access my mail remotely > from my phone if I want to via IMAP), and the dovecot-pigeonhole > plugin works for all my filtering needs, and gets the mail

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:41:42 -0600 Linuxguy123 wrote: > I'm interested to hear the pros and cons of Claws versus Evolution for > handling email. I chucked evolution a while back after the 3,721 update added yet another kwel feature I didn't need, but didn't fix any existing bugs. I like claws

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 04/04/2011 11:16 AM, suvayu ali wrote: >> Claws is the default email client for XFCE. In my opinion it is the >> "almost perfect" email program. Very easily customisable and even the >> defaults are very sane (e.g. plain text emails). > >  From

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Joe Zeff
On 04/04/2011 11:16 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > Claws is the default email client for XFCE. In my opinion it is the > "almost perfect" email program. Very easily customisable and even the > defaults are very sane (e.g. plain text emails). From what I can tell, more and more people simply adore html e

Re: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread suvayu ali
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote: > Claws appears to be "Gnome" based, but also runs on Windows ? Claws is the default email client for XFCE. In my opinion it is the "almost perfect" email program. Very easily customisable and even the defaults are very sane (e.g. plain text ema

RE: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Linuxguy123
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 19:45 +0200, mattias wrote: > Gnome or kde? I run KDE. Claws appears to be "Gnome" based, but also runs on Windows ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/user

RE: Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread mattias
Gnome or kde? -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Linuxguy123 Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:42 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Claws versus Evolution for email. I'm interested to

Claws versus Evolution for email.

2011-04-04 Thread Linuxguy123
I'm interested to hear the pros and cons of Claws versus Evolution for handling email. I'm subscribed to about 10 email groups. I do a ton of filtering, into about 20 different folders. I don't have anything against Evolution. I've been using it for almost 10 years. However, it seems a bit