On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:39:33 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> EDIT : reading more on the Arch topic, I must add my application is built
> with go. Rfering to Go packaging binaries[0], it seems I must use:
> BuildArch: noarch
> ExclusiveArch: %{go_arches} noarch
>
> Is this correct?
No. You seem to
On 01/15/2017 04:56 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on
64 bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm
Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
E: no-binary
How can it be 64-bit only *and
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64
> bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
> myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm
>
> Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
> E: no-binary
>
> Googling
I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64
bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm
Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
E: no-binary
Googling I found the package should be of the noarch architecture. Adding
Build
