Hi Jerry,
I am actually bind maintainer. I would recommend using fedpkg command
instead. It does more or less the same as mock here, but is a bit
simpler to use.
Just use:
fedpkg clone bind
cd bind
git checkout f32
fedpkg mock-build
Adding to mock group is still required however.
It would buil
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/28/20 1:06 PM, David wrote:
>> What factors will play out by the person choosing to
>> replace the current version of "bind" in the Rawhide
>> repo" with a later version ?
>
> For rawhide, mostly just does it work and does it break
> anything else.
[...]
>> And finally, w
Samuel's answers were excellent. I just want to add one thing.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> That is a huge topic. I don't know where to start with that. I use
> "rpmbuild" for my purposes, but I've seen it mentioned that "mock" is
> the recommended way to build. Actual
On 4/28/20 1:06 PM, David wrote:
I have nunerous Linux newbie questions, just using "bind" as a package
example.
The new 9.16 test-version of "bind" is considered "upstream.". Right ?
No, "upstream" is the project supplying the source code.
"dnf info bind" gives https://www.isc.org/downloads
I have nunerous Linux newbie questions, just using "bind" as a package
example.
The new 9.16 test-version of "bind" is considered "upstream.". Right ?
Is 9.17 "further upstream" ?
What factors will play out by the person choosing to replace the current
version of "bind" in the Rawhide repo" wit
