On 11/18/20 8:52 AM, William Oliver wrote:
I'd like to say thanks to everybody who responded. I don't know much
about containers, so I'll have to do some self-educating to see if
these are good solutions -- but they certainly look like a good place
to dig around in. I appreciate the help. If I
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 11:51 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> [snip]
> Very good idea, namespaces are a very powerful tool that many people
> ignore.
>
> I sometimes want to run a program without allowing any network
> access,
> my approach is:
>
> unshare -n /bin/bash
>
> this will give you a shel
On 11/18/20 6:51 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> unshare -n /bin/bash
>
> this will give you a shell where everything can be run, but ifconfig
> -a will show you that there is no network interfaces (localhost is
> missing too).
Never thought about that one. Great idea.
> The idea of letting podman
On 2020-11-17 20:14, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
Ok, I've just did it now. I launched my VPN within a container. Then
on my host I searched for the $PID of the process and then:
nsenter -t $PID -n firefox
Now Firefox shares the network namepsace of the running container
(without having to create a
On 11/17/20 6:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've done this successfully using a VM, but not with a container. Can
> you give step-by-step instructions? I'm not very familiar with the
> container stuff other than basic uses of flatpak.
Well there are no specific steps. It'll all depend on wh
On 17Nov2020 09:00, William Oliver wrote:
>I normally use a VPN that routes through another country. This works
>fine. However, a site I often use recently changed its security
>policies and now will only allow connection from networks that claim to
>be based in the US. So, in order to connect,
On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 15:14 -0400, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 11/17/20 2:44 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> > On 11/17/20 10:00 AM, William Oliver wrote:
> > > Is this doable? Does anybody know where to look for info?
> >
> > What about running that 2nd VPN (US-based) within a standard container?
> >
On 11/17/20 6:00 AM, William Oliver wrote:
I normally use a VPN that routes through another country. This works
fine. However, a site I often use recently changed its security
policies and now will only allow connection from networks that claim to
be based in the US. So, in order to connect, I
On 11/17/20 2:44 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 11/17/20 10:00 AM, William Oliver wrote:
>> Is this doable? Does anybody know where to look for info?
>
> What about running that 2nd VPN (US-based) within a standard container?
> Then open your needed apps "in that same network namespace"? (the
>
On 11/17/20 10:00 AM, William Oliver wrote:
> Is this doable? Does anybody know where to look for info?
What about running that 2nd VPN (US-based) within a standard container?
Then open your needed apps "in that same network namespace"? (the
network namespace of the container running the VPN).
> On 17 Nov 2020, at 14:00, William Oliver wrote:
>
> This isn't a fedora-specific question, but I don't know where to ask.
>
> If there's a fedora-specific answer, thanks, and if not, I'd
> appreciate a pointer to the apprpropriate forum.
>
> I normally use a VPN that routes through another
On Tue, 2020-11-17 at 09:00 -0500, William Oliver wrote:
> This isn't a fedora-specific question, but I don't know where to ask.
>
> If there's a fedora-specific answer, thanks, and if not, I'd
> appreciate a pointer to the apprpropriate forum.
>
> I normally use a VPN that routes through anothe
This isn't a fedora-specific question, but I don't know where to ask.
If there's a fedora-specific answer, thanks, and if not, I'd
appreciate a pointer to the apprpropriate forum.
I normally use a VPN that routes through another country. This works
fine. However, a site I often use recently ch
13 matches
Mail list logo
