On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:43:11 -0800
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Maybe you're thinking of another distro?
Maybe I am. I install bazillions of them on
virtual machines for testing our software
on different releases :-).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fe
On 11/23/2016 11:27 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I've always had to edit PermitRootLogin to say "yes"
in every release that I can remember till now. It was
always something like "prohibit-password" before,
but now the installed sshd_config file actually says "yes":-).
# grep PermitRoot /etc/ssh/sshd
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:34:18 -0800
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I'm not aware of any release of a Red Hat derived system that defaults
> to disallowing root logins by default.
I've always had to edit PermitRootLogin to say "yes"
in every release that I can remember till now. It was
always something l
On 11/23/2016 08:54 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
For the first time in years, I can ssh in as root
on fedora 25 without having to modify the sshd_config
to allow it. What happened? Did the security
geeks lose a bet or something?
I'm not aware of any release of a Red Hat derived system that defaults
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
On Nov 23, 2016 11:54 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> For the first time in years, I can ssh in as root
> on fedora 25 without having to modify the sshd_config
> to allow it. What happened? Did the security
> geeks lose a bet or something?
> __
For the first time in years, I can ssh in as root
on fedora 25 without having to modify the sshd_config
to allow it. What happened? Did the security
geeks lose a bet or something?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jesse Palser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My team and I are working on an
> open-source cross-platform multi-player
> Tetris(R) game called:
> "TetriCrisis 3 100% C.P.U."...
>
> Was hoping some people can
> help test it on their Fedora systems?
If you're expecting people to c
Hi,
My team and I are working on an
open-source cross-platform multi-player
Tetris(R) game called:
"TetriCrisis 3 100% C.P.U."...
Was hoping some people can
help test it on their Fedora systems?
Game requires the following:
- SDL 1.2
- SDL_Image
- SDL_Mixer
- SDL_TTF
- G++
- OpenGL(R) w/ hardwar
On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:48:08 +0200
Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
> > and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
> > to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
> > with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.
2011/5/18 Tom Horsley :
> I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
> and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
> to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
> with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.
here is the solution for your specified
19:58
To: Fedora List
Subject: Amazing Linux victory!
I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.
Wondering if this
On Wed, 18 May 2011 11:23:59 +1000
Chris Smart wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
> > and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
> > to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
> >
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
> and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
> to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
> with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.
How is the
I just hooked up a Dell Zino HD via hdmi to a vizio HD TV
and no power on earth seemed to be able to get the desktop
to display at full width and height 1920x1080 resolution
with the ATI video that comes with it in Windows 7.
Wondering if this was a vizio problem or a driver problem,
I booted a li
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 23:19:19 +0930,
Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I think I would also make the point that it isn't a good idea to
> > starting adding additional questions/issues into an existing thread.
> > I feel it would have been better to start a
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 20:58 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I think I would also make the point that it isn't a good idea to
> starting adding additional questions/issues into an existing thread.
> I feel it would have been better to start a new message/thread with
> "How to download videos" as the Subj
On 06/16/2010 08:49 PM, Tim wrote:
> By the way, on this list we don't top post (writing replies above the
> message you're replying to), nor do we quote the entire prior message,
> just the bits that need seeing to make sense of the reply. As I've done
> with my replies. The list guidelines (a l
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:40 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> my etc/event.d/control-alt-delete file (fc11) is like that:
>
> # control-alt-delete - emergency keypress handling
> #
> # This task is run whenever the Control-Alt-Delete key combination is
> # pressed. Usually used to shut down the mac
atch?v=pRpeEdMmmQ0
in the directory from where the command was issued but NOT the video.
Though it is very basic thing, but still confusing.
Thx.
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Tim
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:19:22 +0930
>
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:56 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> 1. If by mistake or unfortunately, the password is typed wrong two or
> three times at the time while PC restarts (the password set via BIOS),
> are there chances that the system may be locked or any other problem
> may come? and the same q
;
ca:12345:ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -t1 -a -r now'.
So how could it be done?
thx.
-- Forwarded message --
> From: Tim
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:00:25 +0930
> Subject: Re: Subject: Subject: Re: Amazing problem of /boot
&
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 18:33 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> but if we have more kernels, it occupies more space, may be less,
> though it may be good for testing purpose but for disk utility is it
> okay always to have more than one kernel?
I think some meaning is getting lost in translation.
Unle
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Larry Brower
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:55:22 -0500
> Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Amazing problem of /boot
>
>
>> Here, after updating the system (from the GUI,
>> Syst
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 12:21 +0530, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> Here, after updating the system (from the GUI,
> System>Administration--->Software Update), i see in above two
> titles of Fedora, and why it is so? but the no. is bracket for two are
> different, respectively:
>
> 'title Fedora (2.6.
>
> Here, after updating the system (from the GUI,
> System>Administration--->Software Update), i see in above two titles
> of Fedora, and why it is so? but the no. is bracket for two are
> different, respectively:
>
> 'title Fedora (2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586)'
> 'title Fedora (2.6.29.
for two are different,
respectively:
'title Fedora (2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586)'
'title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i586)'
i am confused why it is so.
thx
-- Forwarded message --
> From: Tim
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Date: Sun, 1
lpa Pathum"
>>To: Community support for Fedora users
>>Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:42:26 +0530
>>Subject: Re: Amazing problem of /boot
>>Thanks for the explanation.
*
Yes, thanks a lot.
*
>>-
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 17:59 +0530, W.H. Kalpa Pathum wrote:
>> As I know fstab only shows the mounted partitions.
>
> fstab holds the mount points for things that will be mounted, they may
> be, they may not be, but it tables where they will be, and ho
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 17:59 +0530, W.H. Kalpa Pathum wrote:
> As I know fstab only shows the mounted partitions.
fstab holds the mount points for things that will be mounted, they may
be, they may not be, but it tables where they will be, and how (unless
the mounting function specifies different o
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Ed Greshko wrote:
>On 06/12/2010 08:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> And what precisely does this '1 2c' do?
>
>It points out that your eyesight is better than mine.
I doubt that, diabetes and cataracts that go with 75 years are slowly doing
their thing.
>And, as Sam point
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Pallav Jain wrote:
> today i am amazed to see that my /boot folder is empty and i am unable to
> decide and generate the reason(s) for it, why suddenly is it happening, i my
> self not able to understand though i have installed fedora core 11 and
> updated all the
On 06/12/2010 08:31 PM, W.H. Kalpa Pathum wrote:
>
> OOps I got it all messed up. Pallav has an entry for /boot in fstab. I
> didn't notice it earlier.
>
No problem I also think you've confused mtab with fstab.
--
Sacher's Observation: Some people grow with responsibility -- others
merely
2010/6/12 W.H. Kalpa Pathum :
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/12/2010 07:17 PM, Pallav Jain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The output of the file /etc/fstab is:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> #
>>> # /etc/fstab
>>> # Created by anaconda on Mon Jun 7 06:08:04 20
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/12/2010 07:17 PM, Pallav Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> The output of the file /etc/fstab is:
>>
>>
>>
>> #
>> # /etc/fstab
>> # Created by anaconda on Mon Jun 7 06:08:04 2010
>> #
>> # Accessible filesystems, by re
On 06/12/2010 08:11 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> And what precisely does this '1 2c' do?
>
>
It points out that your eyesight is better than mine.
And, as Sam pointed out, would explain why /boot isn't mounted.
--
Unquestionably, there is progress. The average American now pays out
twice as mu
On 12 June 2010 13:11, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 12 June 2010, Pallav Jain wrote:
>># /etc/fstab
>># Created by anaconda on Mon Jun 7 06:08:04 2010
>>#
>># Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk'
>># See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or vol_id(
On Saturday 12 June 2010, Pallav Jain wrote:
>today i am amazed to see that my /boot folder is empty and i am unable to
>decide and generate the reason(s) for it, why suddenly is it happening, i
> my self not able to understand though i have installed fedora core 11 and
> updated all the packages v
On 06/12/2010 07:17 PM, Pallav Jain wrote:
>
>
> The output of the file /etc/fstab is:
>
>
>
> #
> # /etc/fstab
> # Created by anaconda on Mon Jun 7 06:08:04 2010
> #
> # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk'
> # See man pages fstab
today i am amazed to see that my /boot folder is empty and i am unable to
decide and generate the reason(s) for it, why suddenly is it happening, i my
self not able to understand though i have installed fedora core 11 and
updated all the packages via GUI, irrespective of the fact that whether the
p
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Pallav Jain wrote:
> today i am amazed to see that my /boot folder is empty and i am unable to
> decide and generate the reason(s) for it, why suddenly is it happening, i my
> self not able to understand though i have installed fedora core 11 and
> updated all the
today i am amazed to see that my /boot folder is empty and i am unable to
decide and generate the reason(s) for it, why suddenly is it happening, i my
self not able to understand though i have installed fedora core 11 and
updated all the packages via GUI, irrespective of the fact that whether the
p
41 matches
Mail list logo
