On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 17:11, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Why? All of the Microsoft fanbois will have it and you'll be able to use it
> on your Mac. Like it or not, that's well over 90% of the market, and to
> Adobe, that's all that matters.
I think that´s looking at it from the wrong side. What Google
On 3/1/2012 7:32 PM, nomnex wrote:
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:46:11 -0800
Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I haven't hit anything that doesn't play in my base tests (mp4, qt,
avi, wmv, and mov). Do you know of a format that isn't picked up in
whatever yum/rpm pulls in for mplayer/rpmfusion?
Possibly "Real
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:46:11 -0800
> Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
> I haven't hit anything that doesn't play in my base tests (mp4, qt,
> avi, wmv, and mov). Do you know of a format that isn't picked up in
> whatever yum/rpm pulls in for mplayer/rpmfusion?
Possibly "Real Player" crap, among oth
On 3/1/2012 5:21 PM, nomnex wrote:
You are welcome.
Make sure you have the MPlayer all-codecs pack installed. You have to
install them manually (unless to be wrong, they are not in the RPMFusion
package).
download: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/codecs/
info: Binary Codec Packages
> On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:56:33 -0800
> Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2012 8:13 AM, Alchemist wrote:
> > 2012/2/25 nomnex:
> >>
> > Yes SMPlayer is highly recommended GUI for mplayer
>
> nomnex and alchemist:
>
> Sorry for the delay in getting back as I had family visit descend
> upon my h
On 2/24/2012 5:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:02:30 -0800
Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I've got this wacky setup (I don't actually use, but have tested)
for running mplayer from my phone via a web browser and some cgi
scripts that inject artificial LIRC keypresses (I would have dra
On 2/25/2012 8:13 AM, Alchemist wrote:
2012/2/25 nomnex:
Yes SMPlayer is highly recommended GUI for mplayer
nomnex and alchemist:
Sorry for the delay in getting back as I had family visit descend upon
my house.
I downloaded smplayer and gave it a test drive, works great ... many
thanks
2012/2/25 nomnex :
>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:02:30 -0800
>> Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>>
>> VLC works very nicely on my testbed of files. I've got a couple minor
>> concerns, but that's for me to figure out more about VLC.
>>
>> Mplayer played the files well, but the gui just didn't work.
>
> I use
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:02:30 -0800
> Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
> VLC works very nicely on my testbed of files. I've got a couple minor
> concerns, but that's for me to figure out more about VLC.
>
> Mplayer played the files well, but the gui just didn't work.
I use smplayer (a front end for
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:02:30 -0800
Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Mplayer played the files well, but the gui just didn't work. And dealing
> with hot keys rather than a gui seems like an awkward substitute.
I've got this wacky setup (I don't actually use, but have tested)
for running mplayer from my
On 2/23/2012 10:12 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To all:
Thanks for suggestions for vlc and mplayer. Will try both and see what
I get.
Paul
VLC works very nicely on my testbed of files. I've got a couple minor
concerns, but that's for me to figure out more about VLC.
Mplayer played the f
2012/2/24 suvayu ali :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 22:52, Alchemist wrote:
>>> I like VLC, however I would also suggest trying mplayer. Its just way
>>> too awesome. :)
>>>
>>
>> it is also much more better then VLC, due less cpu/memory work. Just
>> take a good GUI and play
>
> Well I wouldn't go t
On 2/23/2012 2:30 PM, jdow wrote:
On 2012/02/23 12:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its
the right tool.
Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that
under the
right cir
To all:
Thanks for suggestions for vlc and mplayer. Will try both and see what I
get.
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 22:52, Alchemist wrote:
>> I like VLC, however I would also suggest trying mplayer. Its just way
>> too awesome. :)
>>
>
> it is also much more better then VLC, due less cpu/memory work. Just
> take a good GUI and play
Well I wouldn't go that far as much better. There are
On 2012/02/23 14:58, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 02:30 PM, jdow wrote:
Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe.
So? Rhythmbox, Anorak and Parole are all in the repos, and there are probably
others there that work. One of the glories of Open Source is that there's almos
On 02/23/2012 02:30 PM, jdow wrote:
Some programs will never appear on Open Source platforms, Joe.
So? Rhythmbox, Anorak and Parole are all in the repos, and there are
probably others there that work. One of the glories of Open Source is
that there's almost always a free alternative to any
On 2012/02/23 12:01, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its
the right tool.
Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that under the
right circumstances it's not only possible, i
2012/2/23 suvayu ali :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>>> I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything
>>> it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows.
>>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> Let me take a look at this as I am not happy with th
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 20:06, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>> I'd suggest using VLC from RPMFusion. I've never come across anything
>> it couldn't play, which is why I've always used it, even on Windows.
>> ;-)
>
>
> Let me take a look at this as I am not happy with the total lack of response
> from
On 02/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To me, that's pretty much a case of being off Windows except when its
the right tool.
Not everybody *can* be 100% Windows free. My post was to show that
under the right circumstances it's not only possible, it's easy. And,
as far as Totem goe
On 2/23/2012 10:42 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Note that I could care less whether or not you use Windows. I just
noticed some things that might make your Linux experience better, if
you so desire. :-)
T.C.:
Noted and comments taken as such (smile)
[re: Totem]
I'd suggest using VLC from
Note that I could care less whether or not you use Windows. I just
noticed some things that might make your Linux experience better, if
you so desire. :-)
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Joe:
>
> With the introduction of F16, Totem either crashes or misplays (I've
>
On 2/23/2012 12:14 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I've been running strictly Linux since F9. The only time I'm at a
computer running Windows is when I'm at my SF club playing a
first-person shooter on one of the club's Windows boxes. Strictly
speaking, my desktop is still dual boot, but I haven't boot
Original Message
Subject: Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
From: Alan Cox
Date: Wed, February 22, 2012 5:25 pm
To: Community support for Fedora users
Cc: b...@borg1911.com
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:18:16 -0700
"Nex6" wrote:
>
> H
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Alchemist wrote:
>
> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:59, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> For me as a student, this will force me to buy and use Windows
> immediately, which I haven't used since Windows 3.1. It is absolutely
> crucial for me to be able to view all websites, and a lot of them use flash.
> The day this will no longer be
On 02/22/2012 11:16 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I've been trying to "kick the Windows habit" for awhile and it gets
better and better each year. But I know that there are just going to be
situations where Windows is best (or only). And, to me, that's part of
the landscape.
I've been running st
On 2/22/2012 10:59 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
For me as a student, this will force me to buy and use Windows
immediately, which I haven't used since Windows 3.1. It is absolutely
crucial for me to be able to view all websites, and a lot of them use flash.
The day this will no longer be possible on my
On 23.02.2012, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I don't see it as a problem, I see it as yet another thing
> that will help hasten the demise of flash.
For me as a student, this will force me to buy and use Windows
immediately, which I haven't used since Windows 3.1. It is absolutely
crucial for me to be a
On 02/22/2012 11:52 AM, Alchemist wrote:
> 2012/2/22 Greg Woods :
>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 20:19 +0200, Alchemist wrote:
>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html
>> That appears to say that the Flash plugin for 64-bit Linux will only
On 02/23/2012 03:47 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>
> Also let's not forget that Google is pushing HTML5 and that means H.264
> for now.
Not sure why you claim that since Google open sourced VP8 and YouTube is
encoding by default to WebM and displaying in WebM automatically if
Flash player is not in
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:18:16 -0700
"Nex6" wrote:
>
> Here is the adobe link:
> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html
>
> and it says they are changing APIs, and will support the current API/plugins
> (11.2) for 5 years.
>
> a
On 02/22/2012 12:53 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
Joe Zeff wrote:
Why? All of the Microsoft fanbois will have it and you'll be able
to use it on your Mac. Like it or not, that's well over 90% of the
market, and to Adobe, that's all that matters.
Not any more: they’ve never had Flash on iPhone
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Why? All of the Microsoft fanbois will have it and you'll be able
> to use it on your Mac. Like it or not, that's well over 90% of the
> market, and to Adobe, that's all that matters.
Not any more: they’ve never had Flash on iPhone or iPad, a lot of
Android devices don’t have i
Original Message
Subject: Re: Adobe and Google Partnering for Flash Player on Linux
From: Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us>
Date: Wed, February 22, 2012 1:11 pm
To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
On 02/22/2012 12:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
&
On 02/22/2012 12:04 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I don't see it as a problem, I see it as yet another thing
that will help hasten the demise of flash.
Why? All of the Microsoft fanbois will have it and you'll be able to
use it on your Mac. Like it or not, that's well over 90% of the market,
and t
2012/2/22 Tom Horsley :
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:52:29 +0200
> Alchemist wrote:
>
>> then this is a real problem for Linux users i think.
>
> I don't see it as a problem, I see it as yet another thing
> that will help hasten the demise of flash.t
> --
Yes, for example using html5 in future. But if
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:52:29 +0200
Alchemist wrote:
> then this is a real problem for Linux users i think.
I don't see it as a problem, I see it as yet another thing
that will help hasten the demise of flash.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
2012/2/22 Greg Woods :
> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 20:19 +0200, Alchemist wrote:
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html
>
> That appears to say that the Flash plugin for 64-bit Linux will only be
> distributed as part of the Chrome brows
On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 20:19 +0200, Alchemist wrote:
> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/02/adobe-and-google-partnering-for-flash-player-on-linux.html
That appears to say that the Flash plugin for 64-bit Linux will only be
distributed as part of the Chrome browser? That is certainly not good
41 matches
Mail list logo
