Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-14 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > >>> What .conf file or files do I have to manually vi to fix this? Any ideas? >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > >> Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". > Also, do not forget to edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifc

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:52:25AM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > As to how the cards are enumerated...unless the system was installed > with the new NIC already there, it depends on how the mobo scans the > buses. For example, on Dell 2950s, the on-board NICs are seen first, > followed by the PCI c

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 09:59 -0500, Mikkel wrote: > On 04/13/2010 08:05 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > >> If you are using NetworkManager, God knows how to > >> name the interfaces... > > > > God may or may not know but normally the wireless i

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-13 Thread Rick Stevens
On 04/13/2010 06:05 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) >> Gabriel VLASIU wrote: >> >>> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >>> >>> Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". >> >> Ah, but this all gets very Ali

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-13 Thread Mikkel
On 04/13/2010 08:05 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> If you are using NetworkManager, God knows how to >> name the interfaces... > > God may or may not know but normally the wireless interface is eth1. It depends on the driver. My wireless inter

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-13 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2010-04-12 at 08:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) > Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > > > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > > > Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". > > Ah, but this all gets very Alice In Wonderland. The > names in the udev rules

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Gabriel VLASIU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Tom H wrote: > For the (strange) record - and on F13. > > I changed "/etc/udev/rules.d/70...net..." to associate my single NIC's > MAC address to eth1 (instead of eth0, of course). I rebooted without > changing ifcfg-eth0's name

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) > Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >> >> Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". > > Ah, but this all gets very Alice In Wonderland. The > names in the udev rules are the

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 04/12/2010 04:07 PM, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: > > >> I just added an NIC to one of my Virtual F12 instances which uses >> NetworkManager. It just added it in without fuss or muss. It named it >> eth1.

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:51:04 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > I just added an NIC to one of my Virtual F12 instances which uses > NetworkManager. It just added it in without fuss or muss. It named it > eth1. Isn't this how "easy" NM is supposed to be? :-) My impression is that it is completely rando

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Gabriel VLASIU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Ed Greshko wrote: > I just added an NIC to one of my Virtual F12 instances which uses > NetworkManager. It just added it in without fuss or muss. It named it > eth1. Isn't this how "easy" NM is supposed to be? :-) I don't know

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Ed Greshko
On 04/12/2010 08:32 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) > Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > > >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules >> >> Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". >> > Ah, but this all gets very Alice In Wonderland. The > names in the udev rules are the

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:34:38 +0300 (EEST) Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". Ah, but this all gets very Alice In Wonderland. The names in the udev rules are the names of the "device", the names of the "interface" can be differ

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Gabriel VLASIU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Gabriel VLASIU wrote: > > What .conf file or files do I have to manually vi to fix this? Any ideas? > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules > > Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". Also, do not forget to edit /etc/sysconfig/ne

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Gabriel VLASIU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > What .conf file or files do I have to manually vi to fix this? Any ideas? /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules Look for NAME="eth0", NAME="eth1". Gabriel - -- // Gabriel VLASIU // // OpenGPG-KeyID

Re: Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Aioanei Rares
On 04/12/2010 12:47 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: > I have a working Fedora 12 system which is working as a Domain Host on > the built-in eth0 interface. I need to have a second interface for some > in-house requirements. > > Every time I insert the add-in card the system redefines my interfaces > as e

Adding a NIC

2010-04-12 Thread Mike Dwiggins
I have a working Fedora 12 system which is working as a Domain Host on the built-in eth0 interface. I need to have a second interface for some in-house requirements. Every time I insert the add-in card the system redefines my interfaces as eth0 (which is the new card) and eth1_rename thus havi