Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-17 Thread Steve Blackwell
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:20:53 -0400 Steve Blackwell wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:41:11 -0600 > Frank Cox wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:16 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > > > I'm struggling to explain why I appear to never have problems > > > when the router is taken out of the eq

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Steve Blackwell
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:41:11 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:16 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > > I'm struggling to explain why I appear to never have problems > > when the router is taken out of the equation. How can I prove to my > > ISP > > that it is their problem? > > H

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Peter Larsen
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 13:41 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:16 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > > I'm struggling to explain why I appear to never have problems > > when the router is taken out of the equation. How can I prove to my > > ISP > > that it is their problem? > > How ca

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:21 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On my router it is possible to configure things so the DHCP server is > the ISP's server instead of your router acting as the DHCP server . If > that is happening to you that might cause the problem you see, Make > sure > your local lan add

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
>> No, I'm just running the claws-mail client on this machine and my wife >> is running zimbra on her Windows 7 laptop. We've both had e-mails not >> arrive. >> I'm struggling to explain why I appear to never have problems >> when the router is taken out of the equation. How can I prove to my ISP >

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:16 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:07:32 -0600 > Frank Cox wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:50 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > > > This makes no sense to me. If someone sending an e-mail to me gets > > > the mail bounced back to them with

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:16 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > I'm struggling to explain why I appear to never have problems > when the router is taken out of the equation. How can I prove to my > ISP > that it is their problem? How can I prove that the fact that I mowed my lawn yesterday didn't cau

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Steve Blackwell
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:07:32 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:50 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > > This makes no sense to me. If someone sending an e-mail to me gets > > the mail bounced back to them with a server time out error from the > > ISP, > > how could my router affect

Re: [OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:50 -0400, Steve Blackwell wrote: > This makes no sense to me. If someone sending an e-mail to me gets > the mail bounced back to them with a server time out error from the > ISP, > how could my router affect that? The router in question is a Linksys > e3000. I called them

[OT] e-mail problems

2010-09-16 Thread Steve Blackwell
I have been having some problems with my e-mail for about a week or so. Some e-mails are not getting delivered but most are. I contacted my ISP and they had me plug the cable modem directly to the computer instead of through the router and the problems appear to go away. This makes no sense to